PLTW vs. ACYS
PLTW (PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF) and ACYS (FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.19 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. PLTW charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for ACYS.
Performance
PLTW vs. ACYS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
PLTW
- 1D
- 2.04%
- 1M
- -4.02%
- 6M
- -20.95%
- YTD
- -37.29%
- 1Y
- -28.95%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -13.93%
ACYS
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- 0.62%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $8.16M | $7.21M | $6.15M | |
| $2.58M | $2.73M | $3.69M |
PLTW vs. ACYS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
PLTW PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF | -22.41% |
ACYS FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF | 2.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between PLTW and ACYS is 0.19, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2026 | 0.19 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PLTW vs. ACYS — Risk / Return Rank
PLTW
ACYS
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
PLTW vs. ACYS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF (PLTW) and FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF (ACYS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PLTW | ACYS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.51 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.92 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PLTW vs. ACYS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PLTW drawdown since its inception was -57.27%, which is greater than ACYS's maximum drawdown of -0.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLTW and ACYS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PLTW | ACYS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.27% | -0.78% | -56.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -57.27% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -48.71% | 0.00% | -48.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.26% | -0.16% | -25.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 31.63% | — | — |
Volatility
PLTW vs. ACYS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PLTW | ACYS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.51% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 48.86% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 62.65% | 3.76% | +58.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 73.45% | 3.76% | +69.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 73.45% | 3.76% | +69.69% |
PLTW vs. ACYS - Expense Ratio Comparison
PLTW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than ACYS's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
PLTW vs. ACYS - Dividend Comparison
PLTW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 137.47%, more than ACYS's 1.27% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
ACYS FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF | 1.27% | 0.00% |
PLTW PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF | 137.47% | 72.40% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PLTW and ACYS have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ACYS is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ACYS is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for PLTW.
PLTW has the higher dividend yield at 137.47%, compared with 1.27% for ACYS.
They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for PLTW and 0.75% for ACYS.
Find the right allocation for PLTW and ACYS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer