PLTU vs. TPYP

Last updated Jul 12, 2026

PLTU (Direxion Daily PLTR Bull 2X ETF) and TPYP (Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - PLTU is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Direxion, while TPYP is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Tortoise North American Pipeline Index. PLTU is actively managed, while TPYP is passively managed. Over the past year, PLTU returned -45.18% vs 26.53% for TPYP. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PLTU charges 0.86%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for TPYP.

Performance

PLTU vs. TPYP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily PLTR Bull 2X ETF (PLTU) and Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund (TPYP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PLTU achieves a -59.41% return, which is significantly lower than TPYP's 22.99% return.

PLTU

• 1D: -3.57%
• 1M: -5.21%
• 6M: -58.85%
• YTD: -59.41%
• 1Y: -45.18%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

TPYP

• 1D: -0.25%
• 1M: 0.79%
• 6M: 24.31%
• YTD: 22.99%
• 1Y: 26.53%
• 3Y*: 24.84%
• 5Y*: 18.54%
• 10Y*: 11.58%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PLTU vs. TPYP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
PLTU Direxion Daily PLTR Bull 2X ETF	-59.41%	223.17%	14.77%
TPYP Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund	22.99%	7.59%	-0.88%

Correlation

The correlation between PLTU and TPYP is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.11
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2024	0.08

The correlation between PLTU and TPYP shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (1 year) to 0.08 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PLTU vs. TPYP - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PLTU	TPYP
Technology	100.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	0.1%
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	68.7%
Financial Services	-	2.4%
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	0.1%
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	22.0%

Return for Risk

PLTU vs. TPYP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PLTU

PLTU Risk / Return Rank: 6
PLTU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
PLTU Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
PLTU Omega Ratio Rank: 7
PLTU Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
PLTU Martin Ratio Rank: 5

TPYP

TPYP Risk / Return Rank: 77
TPYP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
TPYP Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
TPYP Omega Ratio Rank: 72
TPYP Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
TPYP Martin Ratio Rank: 66

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PLTU vs. TPYP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily PLTR Bull 2X ETF (PLTU) and Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund (TPYP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PLTU	TPYP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.44	2.00	-2.44
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.10	2.83	-2.92
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.99	1.34	-0.35
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.57	3.99	-4.56
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.01	9.54	-10.54

PLTU vs. TPYP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PLTU Sharpe Ratio is -0.44, which is lower than the TPYP Sharpe Ratio of 2.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PLTU and TPYP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PLTU vs. TPYP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PLTU drawdown since its inception was -79.43%, which is greater than TPYP's maximum drawdown of -51.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLTU and TPYP.

Drawdown Indicators

	PLTU	TPYP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-79.43%	-51.91%	-27.52%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-79.43%	-6.84%	-72.59%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-13.17%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-17.96%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-51.91%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-71.78%	-2.96%	-68.82%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-34.29%	-7.86%	-26.43%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	45.27%	2.85%	+42.42%

Volatility

PLTU vs. TPYP - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily PLTR Bull 2X ETF (PLTU) has a higher volatility of 32.56% compared to Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund (TPYP) at 5.25%. This indicates that PLTU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TPYP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PLTU	TPYP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	32.56%	5.25%	+27.31%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	79.45%	10.78%	+68.67%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	102.79%	13.65%	+89.14%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	126.10%	17.43%	+108.67%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	126.10%	21.90%	+104.20%

PLTU vs. TPYP - Expense Ratio Comparison

PLTU has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is higher than TPYP's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

PLTU vs. TPYP - Dividend Comparison

PLTU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 58.74%, more than TPYP's 3.21% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PLTU Direxion Daily PLTR Bull 2X ETF	58.74%	23.29%	0.12%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TPYP Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund	3.21%	3.91%	3.95%	4.83%	4.48%	4.86%	6.14%	4.45%	4.58%	3.71%	3.49%	2.56%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PLTU and TPYP in my portfolio?

PLTU and TPYP have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PLTU or TPYP?

PLTU has higher volatility (32.56%) compared to TPYP (5.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PLTU dropped -79.43% vs TPYP's -51.91%.

Which ETF is better, PLTU or TPYP?

On 1-year performance, TPYP leads with 26.53% vs -45.18% for PLTU. On fees, TPYP is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, TPYP has been the lower-risk option at 5.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PLTU or TPYP?

Over the 1-year period, TPYP has performed better with a 26.53% return vs -45.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PLTU or TPYP?

TPYP is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.86% for PLTU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PLTU or TPYP?

PLTU has the higher dividend yield at 58.74%, compared with 3.21% for TPYP.

What is the main difference between PLTU and TPYP?

PLTU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while TPYP is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Tortoise. Their fees differ too: 0.86% for PLTU and 0.40% for TPYP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TPYP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs -0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.