PLTU vs. QTJL
PLTU (Direxion Daily PLTR Bull 2X Shares) and QTJL (Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, PLTU returned -21.46% vs 20.52% for QTJL. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PLTU charges 0.97%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for QTJL.
Performance
PLTU vs. QTJL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PLTU achieves a -46.71% return, which is significantly lower than QTJL's 7.15% return.
PLTU
- 1D
- -13.03%
- 1M
- -9.11%
- YTD
- -46.71%
- 6M
- -46.12%
- 1Y
- -21.46%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QTJL
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- 1.20%
- YTD
- 7.15%
- 6M
- 7.91%
- 1Y
- 20.52%
- 3Y*
- 19.20%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PLTU vs. QTJL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
PLTU Direxion Daily PLTR Bull 2X Shares | -46.71% | 223.17% | 6.41% |
QTJL Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July | 7.15% | 21.07% | -1.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between PLTU and QTJL is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2024 | 0.58 |
The correlation between PLTU and QTJL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.
PLTU vs. QTJL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PLTU
QTJL
Technology
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
PLTU
QTJL
Basic Materials
PLTU
-
QTJL
Communication Services
PLTU
-
QTJL
Consumer Cyclical
PLTU
-
QTJL
Consumer Defensive
PLTU
-
QTJL
Energy
PLTU
-
QTJL
Financial Services
PLTU
-
QTJL
Healthcare
PLTU
-
QTJL
Industrials
PLTU
-
QTJL
Real Estate
PLTU
-
QTJL
Utilities
PLTU
-
QTJL
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PLTU vs. QTJL — Risk / Return Rank
PLTU
QTJL
PLTU vs. QTJL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily PLTR Bull 2X Shares (PLTU) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July (QTJL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PLTU | QTJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.21 | 2.06 | -2.27 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.40 | 2.93 | -2.53 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.42 | -0.37 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.32 | 3.08 | -3.40 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.54 | 16.23 | -16.78 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PLTU | QTJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.21 | 2.06 | -2.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.52 | -0.12 |
Drawdowns
PLTU vs. QTJL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PLTU drawdown since its inception was -69.14%, which is greater than QTJL's maximum drawdown of -33.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLTU and QTJL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PLTU | QTJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.14% | -33.40% | -35.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -68.10% | -6.68% | -61.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -22.43% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -62.95% | -0.01% | -62.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.90% | -7.94% | -23.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 39.45% | 1.27% | +38.18% |
Volatility
PLTU vs. QTJL - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Daily PLTR Bull 2X Shares (PLTU) has a higher volatility of 36.67% compared to Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July (QTJL) at 0.31%. This indicates that PLTU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QTJL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PLTU | QTJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 36.67% | 0.31% | +36.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 77.36% | 7.61% | +69.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 103.08% | 10.01% | +93.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 127.24% | 20.42% | +106.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 127.24% | 20.42% | +106.82% |
PLTU vs. QTJL - Expense Ratio Comparison
PLTU has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than QTJL's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
PLTU vs. QTJL - Dividend Comparison
PLTU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 44.62%, while QTJL has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
PLTU Direxion Daily PLTR Bull 2X Shares | 44.62% | 23.29% | 0.12% |
QTJL Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PLTU and QTJL have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PLTU has higher volatility (36.67%) compared to QTJL (0.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PLTU dropped -69.14% vs QTJL's -33.40%.
On 1-year performance, QTJL leads with 20.52% vs -21.46% for PLTU. On fees, QTJL is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, QTJL has been the lower-risk option at 0.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, QTJL has performed better with a 20.52% return vs -21.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QTJL is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for PLTU.
PLTU has the higher dividend yield at 44.62%, compared with 0.00% for QTJL.
They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for PLTU and 0.79% for QTJL.
QTJL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs -0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PLTU and QTJL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer