PLTU vs. IBMR

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

PLTU (Direxion Daily PLTR Bull 2X ETF) and IBMR (iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Muni Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PLTU is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Direxion, while IBMR is a Municipal Bonds fund tracking the S&P AMT-Free Municipal Series Callable-Adjusted 2029 Index. PLTU is actively managed, while IBMR is passively managed. Over the past year, PLTU returned -44.11% vs 2.84% for IBMR. At a correlation of -0.07, they often move in opposite directions. PLTU charges 0.86%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for IBMR.

Performance

PLTU vs. IBMR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily PLTR Bull 2X ETF (PLTU) and iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PLTU achieves a -54.93% return, which is significantly lower than IBMR's 0.86% return.

PLTU

• 1D: 0.03%
• 1M: -4.64%
• 6M: -54.76%
• YTD: -54.93%
• 1Y: -44.11%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IBMR

• 1D: -0.02%
• 1M: 0.07%
• 6M: 0.25%
• YTD: 0.86%
• 1Y: 2.84%
• 3Y*: 3.21%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PLTU vs. IBMR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
PLTU Direxion Daily PLTR Bull 2X ETF	-54.93%	223.17%	14.77%
IBMR iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Muni Bond ETF	0.86%	4.45%	-0.91%

Correlation

The correlation between PLTU and IBMR is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.05
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2024	-0.07

Return for Risk

PLTU vs. IBMR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PLTU

PLTU Risk / Return Rank: 6
PLTU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
PLTU Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
PLTU Omega Ratio Rank: 8
PLTU Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
PLTU Martin Ratio Rank: 5

IBMR

IBMR Risk / Return Rank: 55
IBMR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
IBMR Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
IBMR Omega Ratio Rank: 71
IBMR Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
IBMR Martin Ratio Rank: 36

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PLTU vs. IBMR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily PLTR Bull 2X ETF (PLTU) and iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PLTU	IBMR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.43	1.63	-2.07
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.06	2.38	-2.45
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.99	1.34	-0.35
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.56	1.84	-2.39
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.96	4.63	-5.59

PLTU vs. IBMR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PLTU Sharpe Ratio is -0.43, which is lower than the IBMR Sharpe Ratio of 1.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PLTU and IBMR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PLTU vs. IBMR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PLTU drawdown since its inception was -79.43%, which is greater than IBMR's maximum drawdown of -4.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLTU and IBMR.

Drawdown Indicators

	PLTU	IBMR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-79.43%	-4.83%	-74.60%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-79.43%	-1.55%	-77.88%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-4.72%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-68.66%	-0.53%	-68.13%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-34.56%	-1.00%	-33.56%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	45.89%	0.62%	+45.27%

Volatility

PLTU vs. IBMR - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily PLTR Bull 2X ETF (PLTU) has a higher volatility of 32.99% compared to iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMR) at 0.25%. This indicates that PLTU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBMR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PLTU	IBMR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	32.99%	0.25%	+32.74%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	79.69%	1.07%	+78.62%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	102.59%	1.75%	+100.84%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	125.74%	3.02%	+122.72%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	125.74%	3.02%	+122.72%

PLTU vs. IBMR - Expense Ratio Comparison

PLTU has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is higher than IBMR's 0.18% expense ratio.

Dividends

PLTU vs. IBMR - Dividend Comparison

PLTU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 52.89%, more than IBMR's 2.54% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
IBMR iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Muni Bond ETF	2.54%	2.55%	2.53%	1.27%
PLTU Direxion Daily PLTR Bull 2X ETF	52.89%	23.29%	0.12%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PLTU and IBMR in my portfolio?

PLTU and IBMR have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PLTU or IBMR?

PLTU has higher volatility (32.99%) compared to IBMR (0.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PLTU dropped -79.43% vs IBMR's -4.83%.

Which ETF is better, PLTU or IBMR?

On 1-year performance, IBMR leads with 2.84% vs -44.11% for PLTU. On fees, IBMR is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, IBMR has been the lower-risk option at 0.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PLTU or IBMR?

Over the 1-year period, IBMR has performed better with a 2.84% return vs -44.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PLTU or IBMR?

IBMR is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.86% for PLTU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PLTU or IBMR?

PLTU has the higher dividend yield at 52.89%, compared with 2.54% for IBMR.

What is the main difference between PLTU and IBMR?

PLTU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while IBMR is Municipal Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.86% for PLTU and 0.18% for IBMR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IBMR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.63 vs -0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.