PLTR vs. PG
PLTR (Palantir Technologies Inc.) and PG (The Procter & Gamble Company) are both stocks. PLTR operates in Software - Infrastructure (Technology), while PG operates in Household & Personal Products (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 5 years, PLTR returned 41.37%/yr vs 4.10%/yr for PG. At a correlation of -0.09, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
PLTR vs. PG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PLTR achieves a -23.22% return, which is significantly lower than PG's 2.74% return.
PLTR
- 1D
- 0.69%
- 1M
- -0.97%
- YTD
- -23.22%
- 6M
- -24.81%
- 1Y
- 6.85%
- 3Y*
- 108.67%
- 5Y*
- 41.37%
- 10Y*
- —
PG
- 1D
- -0.98%
- 1M
- -0.90%
- YTD
- 2.74%
- 6M
- 6.43%
- 1Y
- -8.99%
- 3Y*
- 2.29%
- 5Y*
- 4.10%
- 10Y*
- 8.64%
PLTR vs. PG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PLTR Palantir Technologies Inc. | -23.22% | 135.03% | 340.48% | 167.45% | -64.74% | -22.68% | 147.89% |
PG The Procter & Gamble Company | 2.74% | -12.26% | 17.25% | -0.86% | -5.05% | 20.52% | 0.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between PLTR and PG is -0.31, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.31 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.12 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2020 | -0.09 |
Over the past year, the inverse relationship between PLTR and PG has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.09 to -0.31, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.
Fundamentals
PLTR:
$350.85B
PG:
$350.63B
PLTR:
$0.89
PG:
$5.23
PLTR:
153.57
PG:
27.76
PLTR:
0.89
PG:
6.79
PLTR:
67.07
PG:
4.07
PLTR:
41.52
PG:
6.50
PLTR:
$5.22B
PG:
$86.72B
PLTR:
$4.39B
PG:
$43.64B
PLTR:
$2.01B
PG:
$22.63B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PLTR vs. PG — Risk / Return Rank
PLTR
PG
PLTR vs. PG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR) and The Procter & Gamble Company (PG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PLTR | PG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.62 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 0.94 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.18 | -0.58 | +0.76 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.33 | -1.04 | +1.37 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PLTR | PG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.14 | -0.48 | +0.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 | 0.23 | +0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.46 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.86 | 0.46 | +0.40 |
Drawdowns
PLTR vs. PG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PLTR drawdown since its inception was -84.62%, which is greater than PG's maximum drawdown of -54.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLTR and PG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PLTR | PG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.62% | -54.25% | -30.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -38.19% | -15.52% | -22.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -40.61% | -21.15% | -19.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -79.14% | -23.77% | -55.37% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -23.77% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -34.13% | -15.91% | -18.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -40.29% | -12.16% | -28.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 20.71% | 8.93% | +11.78% |
Volatility
PLTR vs. PG - Volatility Comparison
Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR) has a higher volatility of 17.24% compared to The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) at 7.01%. This indicates that PLTR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PLTR | PG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.24% | 7.01% | +10.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 38.35% | 15.32% | +23.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 50.93% | 18.65% | +32.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 65.44% | 17.79% | +47.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 69.81% | 19.05% | +50.76% |
Dividends
PLTR vs. PG - Dividend Comparison
PLTR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.94%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PG The Procter & Gamble Company | 2.94% | 2.91% | 2.36% | 2.55% | 2.38% | 2.08% | 2.24% | 2.37% | 3.09% | 2.98% | 3.18% | 3.31% |
PLTR Palantir Technologies Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
PLTR vs. PG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Palantir Technologies Inc. and The Procter & Gamble Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
PLTR vs. PG - Profitability Comparison
PLTR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Palantir Technologies Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.42B and revenue of 1.63B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 86.8%.
PG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Procter & Gamble Company reported a gross profit of 10.51B and revenue of 21.24B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.5%.
PLTR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Palantir Technologies Inc. reported an operating income of 754.00M and revenue of 1.63B, resulting in an operating margin of 46.2%.
PG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Procter & Gamble Company reported an operating income of 4.58B and revenue of 21.24B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.6%.
PLTR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Palantir Technologies Inc. reported a net income of 870.53M and revenue of 1.63B, resulting in a net margin of 53.3%.
PG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Procter & Gamble Company reported a net income of 18.50M and revenue of 21.24B, resulting in a net margin of 0.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
PLTR and PG have a correlation of -0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PLTR has higher volatility (17.24%) compared to PG (7.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PLTR dropped -84.62% vs PG's -54.25%.
PLTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.14 vs -0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PLTR and PG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer