PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PLTR vs. MAP.MC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

PLTR vs. MAP.MC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR) and Mapfre (MAP.MC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

PLTR is traded in USD, while MAP.MC is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the MAP.MC values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PLTR achieves a -27.99% return, which is significantly lower than MAP.MC's -3.15% return.


PLTR

1D
-2.36%
1M
-4.29%
YTD
-27.99%
6M
-30.28%
1Y
-6.85%
3Y*
99.99%
5Y*
39.00%
10Y*

MAP.MC

1D
1.87%
1M
-0.90%
YTD
-3.15%
6M
1.15%
1Y
29.62%
3Y*
40.18%
5Y*
23.12%
10Y*
14.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PLTR vs. MAP.MC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
PLTR
Palantir Technologies Inc.
-27.99%135.03%340.48%167.45%-64.74%-22.68%135.50%
MAP.MC
Mapfre
-3.15%107.46%24.86%17.44%1.11%13.43%30.00%

Correlation

The correlation between PLTR and MAP.MC is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.10

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2020

0.07

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PLTR vs. MAP.MC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PLTR
PLTR Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
PLTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLTR Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
PLTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLTR Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

MAP.MC
MAP.MC Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
MAP.MC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MAP.MC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
MAP.MC Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
MAP.MC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
MAP.MC Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PLTR vs. MAP.MC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR) and Mapfre (MAP.MC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PLTRMAP.MCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

1.23

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.14

1.60

-1.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.25

4.38

-4.63

PLTR vs. MAP.MC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PLTR Sharpe Ratio is -0.11, which is lower than the MAP.MC Sharpe Ratio of 1.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PLTR and MAP.MC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PLTR vs. MAP.MC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PLTR drawdown since its inception was -84.62%, which is greater than MAP.MC's maximum drawdown of -66.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLTR and MAP.MC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PLTRMAP.MCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-84.62%

-66.77%

-17.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-38.22%

-17.80%

-20.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-40.61%

-17.80%

-22.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-79.14%

-31.27%

-47.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-54.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-38.22%

-4.21%

-34.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-40.27%

-22.69%

-17.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

21.23%

6.55%

+14.68%

Volatility

PLTR vs. MAP.MC - Volatility Comparison

Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR) has a higher volatility of 17.16% compared to Mapfre (MAP.MC) at 6.05%. This indicates that PLTR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MAP.MC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PLTRMAP.MCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.16%

6.05%

+11.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

38.32%

18.06%

+20.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

50.83%

22.58%

+28.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

65.44%

23.67%

+41.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

69.75%

26.63%

+43.12%

Dividends

PLTR vs. MAP.MC - Dividend Comparison

PLTR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MAP.MC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.88%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MAP.MC
Mapfre
3.88%3.90%5.15%6.09%6.82%7.53%8.57%6.20%6.30%5.46%4.23%6.06%
PLTR
Palantir Technologies Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

PLTR vs. MAP.MC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Palantir Technologies Inc. and Mapfre. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. PLTR values in USD, MAP.MC values in EUR

Frequently Asked Questions


PLTR and MAP.MC have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PLTR and MAP.MC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer