PLTR vs. FCFAX
PLTR (Palantir Technologies Inc.) is a stock, while FCFAX (Frost Credit Fund) is Short-Term Bond fund managed by Frost Funds. Over the past 5 years, PLTR returned 39.00%/yr vs 3.79%/yr for FCFAX. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PLTR vs. FCFAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PLTR achieves a -27.99% return, which is significantly lower than FCFAX's 1.58% return.
PLTR
- 1D
- -2.36%
- 1M
- -1.58%
- YTD
- -27.99%
- 6M
- -30.28%
- 1Y
- -5.33%
- 3Y*
- 99.99%
- 5Y*
- 39.00%
- 10Y*
- —
FCFAX
- 1D
- 0.33%
- 1M
- 0.72%
- YTD
- 1.58%
- 6M
- 1.88%
- 1Y
- 4.56%
- 3Y*
- 7.23%
- 5Y*
- 3.79%
- 10Y*
- 5.17%
PLTR vs. FCFAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PLTR Palantir Technologies Inc. | -27.99% | 135.03% | 340.48% | 167.45% | -64.74% | -22.68% | 135.50% |
FCFAX Frost Credit Fund | 1.58% | 5.21% | 8.01% | 11.23% | -7.83% | 5.07% | 4.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between PLTR and FCFAX is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2020 | 0.16 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PLTR vs. FCFAX — Risk / Return Rank
PLTR
FCFAX
PLTR vs. FCFAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR) and Frost Credit Fund (FCFAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PLTR | FCFAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 1.43 | -0.40 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.14 | 2.65 | -2.79 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.25 | 9.89 | -10.14 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PLTR vs. FCFAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PLTR drawdown since its inception was -84.62%, which is greater than FCFAX's maximum drawdown of -16.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLTR and FCFAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PLTR | FCFAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.62% | -16.33% | -68.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -38.22% | -1.82% | -36.40% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -40.61% | -2.82% | -37.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -79.14% | -10.49% | -68.65% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -16.33% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -38.22% | 0.00% | -38.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -40.27% | -1.53% | -38.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 21.23% | 0.49% | +20.74% |
Volatility
PLTR vs. FCFAX - Volatility Comparison
Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR) has a higher volatility of 17.16% compared to Frost Credit Fund (FCFAX) at 0.77%. This indicates that PLTR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCFAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PLTR | FCFAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.16% | 0.77% | +16.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 38.32% | 1.76% | +36.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 50.83% | 2.27% | +48.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 65.44% | 2.77% | +62.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 69.75% | 3.24% | +66.51% |
Dividends
PLTR vs. FCFAX - Dividend Comparison
PLTR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FCFAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.15%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCFAX Frost Credit Fund | 6.15% | 6.10% | 5.76% | 5.93% | 5.00% | 3.65% | 3.69% | 4.62% | 5.05% | 5.85% | 4.84% | 4.95% |
PLTR Palantir Technologies Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PLTR and FCFAX have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PLTR has higher volatility (17.16%) compared to FCFAX (0.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PLTR dropped -84.62% vs FCFAX's -16.33%.
FCFAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs -0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PLTR and FCFAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer