PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PLTR vs. BITU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PLTR vs. BITU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR) and Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF (BITU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PLTR achieves a -24.21% return, which is significantly higher than BITU's -51.92% return.


PLTR

1D
5.25%
1M
0.54%
YTD
-24.21%
6M
-26.49%
1Y
-1.96%
3Y*
102.18%
5Y*
40.28%
10Y*

BITU

1D
9.21%
1M
-31.11%
YTD
-51.92%
6M
-50.40%
1Y
-71.62%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PLTR vs. BITU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
PLTR
Palantir Technologies Inc.
-24.21%135.03%230.84%
BITU
Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF
-51.92%-37.07%41.85%

Correlation

The correlation between PLTR and BITU is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2024

0.32

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PLTR vs. BITU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PLTR
PLTR Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
PLTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLTR Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
PLTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLTR Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

BITU
BITU Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
BITU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BITU Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
BITU Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
BITU Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
BITU Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PLTR vs. BITU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR) and Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF (BITU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PLTRBITUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

0.85

+0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.05

-0.87

+0.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.09

-1.38

+1.29

PLTR vs. BITU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PLTR Sharpe Ratio is -0.04, which is higher than the BITU Sharpe Ratio of -0.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PLTR and BITU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PLTR vs. BITU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PLTR drawdown since its inception was -84.62%, roughly equal to the maximum BITU drawdown of -82.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLTR and BITU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PLTRBITUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-84.62%

-82.21%

-2.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-38.22%

-82.21%

+43.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-40.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-79.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-34.98%

-78.50%

+43.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-40.27%

-35.10%

-5.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

21.35%

51.85%

-30.50%

Volatility

PLTR vs. BITU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR) is 17.72%, while Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF (BITU) has a volatility of 25.78%. This indicates that PLTR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BITU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PLTRBITUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.72%

25.78%

-8.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

38.70%

70.18%

-31.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

51.17%

88.32%

-37.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

65.49%

97.56%

-32.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

69.76%

97.56%

-27.80%

Dividends

PLTR vs. BITU - Dividend Comparison

PLTR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BITU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 81.62%.


PositionTTM20252024
BITU
Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF
81.62%50.23%0.12%
PLTR
Palantir Technologies Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PLTR and BITU have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BITU has higher volatility (25.78%) compared to PLTR (17.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PLTR dropped -84.62% vs BITU's -82.21%.

PLTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.04 vs -0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PLTR and BITU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer