PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PLTQX vs. PTDIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PLTQX vs. PTDIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2040 Fund (PLTQX) and Principal LifeTime 2040 Fund (PTDIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PLTQX achieves a 8.67% return, which is significantly higher than PTDIX's 7.20% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with PLTQX having a 10.63% annualized return and PTDIX not far ahead at 10.70%.


PLTQX

1D
-0.39%
1M
2.34%
YTD
8.67%
6M
10.30%
1Y
22.02%
3Y*
15.84%
5Y*
8.56%
10Y*
10.63%

PTDIX

1D
-0.33%
1M
2.23%
YTD
7.20%
6M
8.86%
1Y
18.24%
3Y*
15.96%
5Y*
8.10%
10Y*
10.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PLTQX vs. PTDIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PLTQX
Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2040 Fund
8.67%17.25%14.58%18.16%-17.90%17.09%15.41%23.86%-8.61%19.16%
PTDIX
Principal LifeTime 2040 Fund
7.20%15.59%17.43%18.33%-18.13%15.35%16.04%24.91%-7.95%20.69%

Correlation

The correlation between PLTQX and PTDIX is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2014

0.99

The correlation between PLTQX and PTDIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PLTQX vs. PTDIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PLTQX
PLTQX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
PLTQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLTQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLTQX Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
PLTQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLTQX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

PTDIX
PTDIX Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
PTDIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PTDIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
PTDIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
PTDIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
PTDIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PLTQX vs. PTDIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2040 Fund (PLTQX) and Principal LifeTime 2040 Fund (PTDIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PLTQXPTDIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.32

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.92

2.39

+0.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.07

10.42

+2.65

PLTQX vs. PTDIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PLTQX Sharpe Ratio is 2.04, which is comparable to the PTDIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PLTQX and PTDIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PLTQX vs. PTDIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PLTQX drawdown since its inception was -29.05%, smaller than the maximum PTDIX drawdown of -54.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLTQX and PTDIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PLTQXPTDIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.05%

-54.38%

+25.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.29%

-7.32%

+0.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.75%

-13.05%

-0.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.18%

-25.43%

+1.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.05%

-30.02%

+0.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.67%

-0.56%

-0.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.40%

-7.48%

+3.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.63%

1.68%

-0.05%

Volatility

PLTQX vs. PTDIX - Volatility Comparison

Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2040 Fund (PLTQX) and Principal LifeTime 2040 Fund (PTDIX) have volatilities of 4.01% and 3.87%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PLTQXPTDIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.01%

3.87%

+0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.59%

8.46%

+0.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.49%

10.32%

+0.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.47%

13.57%

-0.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.83%

13.86%

-0.03%

PLTQX vs. PTDIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PLTQX has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is higher than PTDIX's 0.01% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

PLTQX vs. PTDIX - Dividend Comparison

PLTQX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.14%, less than PTDIX's 9.14% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PLTQX
Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2040 Fund
4.14%4.50%4.19%3.14%8.95%5.00%3.85%3.84%4.47%2.37%2.34%1.65%
PTDIX
Principal LifeTime 2040 Fund
9.14%9.80%12.28%4.40%8.61%8.92%6.01%7.26%9.28%6.07%4.86%6.73%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, PLTQX and PTDIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

PLTQX has higher volatility (4.01%) compared to PTDIX (3.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PLTQX dropped -29.05% vs PTDIX's -54.38%.

PLTQX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PLTQX and PTDIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer