PLTNX vs. PLGIX
PLTNX (Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2055 Fund) and PLGIX (Principal LargeCap Growth Fund I) are both mutual funds - PLTNX is a Target Retirement Date fund managed by Principal, while PLGIX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Principal. Over the past 10 years, PLTNX returned 11.97%/yr vs 19.99%/yr for PLGIX. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PLTNX charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.67%/yr for PLGIX.
Performance
PLTNX vs. PLGIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PLTNX achieves a 10.92% return, which is significantly higher than PLGIX's 2.25% return. Over the past 10 years, PLTNX has underperformed PLGIX with an annualized return of 11.97%, while PLGIX has yielded a comparatively higher 19.99% annualized return.
PLTNX
- 1D
- 1.31%
- 1M
- 1.81%
- YTD
- 10.92%
- 6M
- 10.71%
- 1Y
- 27.31%
- 3Y*
- 18.61%
- 5Y*
- 10.72%
- 10Y*
- 11.97%
PLGIX
- 1D
- 1.42%
- 1M
- -0.49%
- YTD
- 2.25%
- 6M
- 1.93%
- 1Y
- 11.85%
- 3Y*
- 32.62%
- 5Y*
- 16.13%
- 10Y*
- 19.99%
PLTNX vs. PLGIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PLTNX Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2055 Fund | 10.92% | 19.89% | 17.25% | 20.33% | -18.49% | 19.70% | 15.78% | 26.17% | -9.84% | 21.03% |
PLGIX Principal LargeCap Growth Fund I | 2.25% | 11.59% | 83.01% | 40.40% | -34.05% | 21.49% | 36.06% | 34.89% | 3.44% | 33.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between PLTNX and PLGIX is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2014 | 0.88 |
The correlation between PLTNX and PLGIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PLTNX vs. PLGIX — Risk / Return Rank
PLTNX
PLGIX
PLTNX vs. PLGIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2055 Fund (PLTNX) and Principal LargeCap Growth Fund I (PLGIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PLTNX | PLGIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.85 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.13 | +0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.11 | 0.62 | +2.49 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.91 | 1.91 | +12.00 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PLTNX vs. PLGIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PLTNX drawdown since its inception was -32.71%, smaller than the maximum PLGIX drawdown of -55.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLTNX and PLGIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PLTNX | PLGIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.71% | -55.43% | +22.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.66% | -18.32% | +9.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.66% | -21.39% | +4.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.48% | -40.63% | +15.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.71% | -40.63% | +7.92% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.67% | -3.93% | +3.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.76% | -13.24% | +8.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.94% | 5.99% | -4.05% |
Volatility
PLTNX vs. PLGIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2055 Fund (PLTNX) is 5.13%, while Principal LargeCap Growth Fund I (PLGIX) has a volatility of 6.21%. This indicates that PLTNX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PLGIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PLTNX | PLGIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.13% | 6.21% | -1.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.49% | 13.13% | -2.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.72% | 16.06% | -3.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.61% | 30.19% | -14.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.89% | 25.49% | -9.60% |
PLTNX vs. PLGIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PLTNX has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than PLGIX's 0.67% expense ratio.
Dividends
PLTNX vs. PLGIX - Dividend Comparison
PLTNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.14%, less than PLGIX's 14.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PLGIX Principal LargeCap Growth Fund I | 14.14% | 14.45% | 63.77% | 5.99% | 11.57% | 11.34% | 7.03% | 8.01% | 16.41% | 7.05% | 4.64% | 12.51% |
PLTNX Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2055 Fund | 4.14% | 4.59% | 4.40% | 2.84% | 9.11% | 4.23% | 3.11% | 3.47% | 4.68% | 2.21% | 1.99% | 1.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PLTNX and PLGIX have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PLGIX has higher volatility (6.21%) compared to PLTNX (5.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PLTNX dropped -32.71% vs PLGIX's -55.43%.
PLTNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PLTNX and PLGIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer