PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PLTHX vs. FCTKX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PLTHX vs. FCTKX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2060 Fund (PLTHX) and Fidelity Freedom 2055 Fund Class K6 (FCTKX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PLTHX achieves a 11.70% return, which is significantly lower than FCTKX's 13.94% return.


PLTHX

1D
0.51%
1M
5.53%
YTD
11.70%
6M
12.29%
1Y
28.05%
3Y*
19.98%
5Y*
10.55%
10Y*
12.09%

FCTKX

1D
0.58%
1M
5.18%
YTD
13.94%
6M
15.86%
1Y
31.62%
3Y*
21.01%
5Y*
10.71%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PLTHX vs. FCTKX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PLTHX
Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2060 Fund
11.70%19.91%17.18%20.28%-18.52%20.05%16.11%26.46%-9.93%10.60%
FCTKX
Fidelity Freedom 2055 Fund Class K6
13.94%24.06%14.41%20.84%-18.09%16.86%18.53%25.67%-8.66%9.78%

Correlation

The correlation between PLTHX and FCTKX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2017

0.96

The correlation between PLTHX and FCTKX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PLTHX vs. FCTKX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PLTHX
PLTHX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
PLTHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLTHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLTHX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
PLTHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLTHX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

FCTKX
FCTKX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
FCTKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCTKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCTKX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
FCTKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCTKX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PLTHX vs. FCTKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2060 Fund (PLTHX) and Fidelity Freedom 2055 Fund Class K6 (FCTKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PLTHXFCTKXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.47

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.34

3.30

+0.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.30

14.70

+0.60

PLTHX vs. FCTKX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PLTHX Sharpe Ratio is 2.41, which is comparable to the FCTKX Sharpe Ratio of 2.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PLTHX and FCTKX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PLTHXFCTKXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.41

2.52

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

0.72

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.69

0.77

-0.07

Drawdowns

PLTHX vs. FCTKX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PLTHX drawdown since its inception was -33.26%, which is greater than FCTKX's maximum drawdown of -30.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLTHX and FCTKX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PLTHXFCTKXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.26%

-30.94%

-2.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.60%

-9.78%

+1.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.64%

-15.40%

-1.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.49%

-27.16%

+1.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.81%

-5.46%

+0.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.87%

2.18%

-0.31%

Volatility

PLTHX vs. FCTKX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2060 Fund (PLTHX) is 3.42%, while Fidelity Freedom 2055 Fund Class K6 (FCTKX) has a volatility of 4.27%. This indicates that PLTHX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCTKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PLTHXFCTKXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.42%

4.27%

-0.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.46%

10.54%

-1.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.93%

12.80%

-0.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.50%

15.05%

+0.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.97%

15.89%

+0.08%

PLTHX vs. FCTKX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PLTHX has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than FCTKX's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

PLTHX vs. FCTKX - Dividend Comparison

PLTHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.91%, less than FCTKX's 5.14% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCTKX
Fidelity Freedom 2055 Fund Class K6
5.14%4.06%2.31%2.19%11.70%11.47%4.40%6.53%7.08%2.74%0.00%0.00%
PLTHX
Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2060 Fund
3.91%4.37%4.30%2.76%7.91%3.84%2.91%3.67%3.47%2.37%2.20%1.65%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, PLTHX and FCTKX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FCTKX has higher volatility (4.27%) compared to PLTHX (3.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PLTHX dropped -33.26% vs FCTKX's -30.94%.

FCTKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 2.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PLTHX and FCTKX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer