PLTG vs. IBMR

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

PLTG (Leverage Shares 2X Long PLTR Daily ETF) and IBMR (iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Muni Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PLTG is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Leverage Shares, while IBMR is a Municipal Bonds fund tracking the S&P AMT-Free Municipal Series Callable-Adjusted 2029 Index. PLTG is actively managed, while IBMR is passively managed. Over the past year, PLTG returned -54.35% vs 3.45% for IBMR. At a correlation of -0.07, they often move in opposite directions. PLTG charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for IBMR.

Performance

PLTG vs. IBMR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long PLTR Daily ETF (PLTG) and iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PLTG achieves a -65.23% return, which is significantly lower than IBMR's 0.79% return.

PLTG

• 1D: -4.81%
• 1M: -30.69%
• YTD: -65.23%
• 6M: -71.20%
• 1Y: -54.35%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IBMR

• 1D: -0.02%
• 1M: 0.66%
• YTD: 0.79%
• 6M: 0.93%
• 1Y: 3.45%
• 3Y*: 3.25%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PLTG vs. IBMR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
PLTG Leverage Shares 2X Long PLTR Daily ETF	-65.23%	100.70%
IBMR iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Muni Bond ETF	0.79%	4.50%

Correlation

The correlation between PLTG and IBMR is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.03
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 25, 2025	-0.07

Return for Risk

PLTG vs. IBMR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PLTG

PLTG Risk / Return Rank: 4
PLTG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
PLTG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
PLTG Omega Ratio Rank: 6
PLTG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
PLTG Martin Ratio Rank: 3

IBMR

IBMR Risk / Return Rank: 61
IBMR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
IBMR Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
IBMR Omega Ratio Rank: 79
IBMR Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
IBMR Martin Ratio Rank: 40

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PLTG vs. IBMR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long PLTR Daily ETF (PLTG) and iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PLTG	IBMR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.53	1.98	-2.51
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.32	2.90	-3.22
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.96	1.42	-0.46
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.71	2.23	-2.94
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.26	5.73	-6.99

PLTG vs. IBMR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PLTG Sharpe Ratio is -0.53, which is lower than the IBMR Sharpe Ratio of 1.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PLTG and IBMR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PLTG vs. IBMR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PLTG drawdown since its inception was -76.37%, which is greater than IBMR's maximum drawdown of -4.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLTG and IBMR.

Drawdown Indicators

	PLTG	IBMR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-76.37%	-4.83%	-71.54%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-76.37%	-1.55%	-74.82%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-4.72%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-76.37%	-0.60%	-75.77%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-32.02%	-1.01%	-31.01%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	43.16%	0.60%	+42.56%

Volatility

PLTG vs. IBMR - Volatility Comparison

Leverage Shares 2X Long PLTR Daily ETF (PLTG) has a higher volatility of 38.03% compared to iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMR) at 0.39%. This indicates that PLTG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBMR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PLTG	IBMR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	38.03%	0.39%	+37.64%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	78.49%	1.15%	+77.34%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	102.77%	1.76%	+101.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	105.82%	3.04%	+102.78%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	105.82%	3.04%	+102.78%

PLTG vs. IBMR - Expense Ratio Comparison

PLTG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than IBMR's 0.18% expense ratio.

Dividends

PLTG vs. IBMR - Dividend Comparison

PLTG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 52.16%, more than IBMR's 2.55% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
IBMR iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Muni Bond ETF	2.55%	2.55%	2.53%	1.27%
PLTG Leverage Shares 2X Long PLTR Daily ETF	52.16%	18.14%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PLTG and IBMR in my portfolio?

PLTG and IBMR have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PLTG or IBMR?

PLTG has higher volatility (38.03%) compared to IBMR (0.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PLTG dropped -76.37% vs IBMR's -4.83%.

Which ETF is better, PLTG or IBMR?

On 1-year performance, IBMR leads with 3.45% vs -54.35% for PLTG. On fees, IBMR is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, IBMR has been the lower-risk option at 0.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PLTG or IBMR?

Over the 1-year period, IBMR has performed better with a 3.45% return vs -54.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PLTG or IBMR?

IBMR is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for PLTG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PLTG or IBMR?

PLTG has the higher dividend yield at 52.16%, compared with 2.55% for IBMR.

What is the main difference between PLTG and IBMR?

PLTG is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while IBMR is Municipal Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for PLTG and 0.18% for IBMR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IBMR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs -0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.