PLTG vs. CRMG

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

PLTG (Leverage Shares 2X Long PLTR Daily ETF) and CRMG (Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Leverage Shares. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, PLTG returned -22.13% vs -60.55% for CRMG. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.

Performance

PLTG vs. CRMG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long PLTR Daily ETF (PLTG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF (CRMG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PLTG achieves a -47.61% return, which is significantly higher than CRMG's -56.09% return.

PLTG

• 1D: -0.72%
• 1M: 4.26%
• YTD: -47.61%
• 6M: -49.25%
• 1Y: -22.13%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CRMG

• 1D: -1.95%
• 1M: -1.95%
• YTD: -56.09%
• 6M: -50.25%
• 1Y: -60.55%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PLTG vs. CRMG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
PLTG Leverage Shares 2X Long PLTR Daily ETF	-47.61%	86.53%
CRMG Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF	-56.09%	-14.78%

Correlation

The correlation between PLTG and CRMG is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.27
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2025	0.27

Return for Risk

PLTG vs. CRMG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PLTG

PLTG Risk / Return Rank: 9
PLTG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
PLTG Sortino Ratio Rank: 12
PLTG Omega Ratio Rank: 12
PLTG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
PLTG Martin Ratio Rank: 7

CRMG

CRMG Risk / Return Rank: 2
CRMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
CRMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
CRMG Omega Ratio Rank: 3
CRMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
CRMG Martin Ratio Rank: 1

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PLTG vs. CRMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long PLTR Daily ETF (PLTG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF (CRMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PLTG	CRMG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.22	-0.81	+0.59
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.39	-1.14	+1.53
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.05	0.86	+0.19
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.32	-0.86	+0.53
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.55	-1.47	+0.93
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PLTG vs. CRMG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PLTG Sharpe Ratio is -0.22, which is higher than the CRMG Sharpe Ratio of -0.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PLTG and CRMG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PLTG	CRMG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.22	-0.81	+0.59
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.02	-0.65	+0.63

Drawdowns

PLTG vs. CRMG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PLTG drawdown since its inception was -69.02%, smaller than the maximum CRMG drawdown of -74.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLTG and CRMG.

Drawdown Indicators

	PLTG	CRMG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-69.02%	-74.38%	+5.36%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-69.02%	-70.91%	+1.89%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-64.40%	-67.87%	+3.47%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-30.48%	-37.81%	+7.33%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	40.34%	41.08%	-0.74%

Volatility

PLTG vs. CRMG - Volatility Comparison

Leverage Shares 2X Long PLTR Daily ETF (PLTG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF (CRMG) have volatilities of 33.39% and 34.03%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PLTG	CRMG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	33.39%	34.03%	-0.64%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	77.78%	63.87%	+13.91%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	103.03%	75.31%	+27.72%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	105.81%	75.62%	+30.19%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	105.81%	75.62%	+30.19%

PLTG vs. CRMG - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both PLTG and CRMG have an expense ratio of 0.75%.

Dividends

PLTG vs. CRMG - Dividend Comparison

PLTG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 34.62%, while CRMG has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
CRMG Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%
PLTG Leverage Shares 2X Long PLTR Daily ETF	34.62%	18.14%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PLTG and CRMG in my portfolio?

PLTG and CRMG have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PLTG or CRMG?

CRMG has higher volatility (34.03%) compared to PLTG (33.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PLTG dropped -69.02% vs CRMG's -74.38%.

Which ETF is better, PLTG or CRMG?

On 1-year performance, PLTG leads with -22.13% vs -60.55% for CRMG. Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. On volatility, PLTG has been the lower-risk option at 33.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PLTG or CRMG?

Over the 1-year period, PLTG has performed better with a -22.13% return vs -60.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PLTG or CRMG?

PLTG and CRMG have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PLTG or CRMG?

PLTG has the higher dividend yield at 34.62%, compared with 0.00% for CRMG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PLTG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.22 vs -0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.