PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PLTE.TO vs. UMAX.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

PLTE.TO vs. UMAX.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Harvest Palantir Enhanced High Income Shares ETF (PLTE.TO) and Hamilton Utilities YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (UMAX.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

PLTE.TO vs. UMAX.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PLTE.TO achieves a -20.02% return, which is significantly lower than UMAX.TO's 5.96% return.


PLTE.TO

1D
0.16%
1M
2.64%
YTD
-20.02%
6M
-20.70%
1Y
74.41%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

UMAX.TO

1D
-0.11%
1M
-1.83%
YTD
5.96%
6M
6.48%
1Y
12.59%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


PLTE.TO vs. UMAX.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

PLTE.TO has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than UMAX.TO's 0.65% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

PLTE.TO vs. UMAX.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PLTE.TO
PLTE.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
PLTE.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLTE.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLTE.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
PLTE.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLTE.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

UMAX.TO
UMAX.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
UMAX.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UMAX.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
UMAX.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
UMAX.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
UMAX.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PLTE.TO vs. UMAX.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harvest Palantir Enhanced High Income Shares ETF (PLTE.TO) and Hamilton Utilities YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (UMAX.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PLTE.TOUMAX.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.19

1.63

-0.45

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.79

2.26

-0.47

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.32

-0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.75

1.98

-0.23

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.33

9.14

-4.81

PLTE.TO vs. UMAX.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PLTE.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.19, which is comparable to the UMAX.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PLTE.TO and UMAX.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PLTE.TOUMAX.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.19

1.63

-0.45

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.19

0.95

+0.24

Correlation

The correlation between PLTE.TO and UMAX.TO is -0.10. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Dividends

PLTE.TO vs. UMAX.TO - Dividend Comparison

PLTE.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 38.27%, more than UMAX.TO's 14.26% yield.


TTM202520242023
PLTE.TO
Harvest Palantir Enhanced High Income Shares ETF
38.27%23.70%0.00%0.00%
UMAX.TO
Hamilton Utilities YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF
14.26%14.86%14.81%6.96%

Drawdowns

PLTE.TO vs. UMAX.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PLTE.TO drawdown since its inception was -43.92%, which is greater than UMAX.TO's maximum drawdown of -10.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLTE.TO and UMAX.TO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


PLTE.TOUMAX.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.92%

-10.09%

-33.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-41.32%

-6.23%

-35.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-30.91%

-1.83%

-29.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.85%

-2.05%

-12.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.72%

1.35%

+15.37%

Volatility

PLTE.TO vs. UMAX.TO - Volatility Comparison

Harvest Palantir Enhanced High Income Shares ETF (PLTE.TO) has a higher volatility of 15.08% compared to Hamilton Utilities YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (UMAX.TO) at 2.12%. This indicates that PLTE.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UMAX.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


PLTE.TOUMAX.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.08%

2.12%

+12.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

41.13%

4.70%

+36.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

62.94%

7.74%

+55.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

70.58%

8.66%

+61.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

70.58%

8.66%

+61.92%