PLTD vs. BULZ

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

PLTD (Direxion Daily PLTR Bear 1X Shares) and BULZ (MicroSectors FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETNs) are both exchange-traded funds - PLTD is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the Palantir Technologies Inc. (-100%), while BULZ is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Solactive FANG Innovation Index (300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, PLTD returned -4.09% vs 175.88% for BULZ. At a correlation of -0.62, they often move in opposite directions. PLTD charges 0.98%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for BULZ.

Performance

PLTD vs. BULZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily PLTR Bear 1X Shares (PLTD) and MicroSectors FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETNs (BULZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PLTD achieves a 33.88% return, which is significantly lower than BULZ's 61.20% return.

PLTD

• 1D: 7.23%
• 1M: 11.32%
• YTD: 33.88%
• 6M: 46.42%
• 1Y: -4.09%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BULZ

• 1D: -2.95%
• 1M: -4.19%
• YTD: 61.20%
• 6M: 55.42%
• 1Y: 175.88%
• 3Y*: 82.14%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PLTD vs. BULZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
PLTD Direxion Daily PLTR Bear 1X Shares	33.88%	-70.53%	-5.12%
BULZ MicroSectors FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETNs	61.20%	60.09%	-7.86%

Correlation

The correlation between PLTD and BULZ is -0.54, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.54
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2024	-0.62

The correlation between PLTD and BULZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.62 to -0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

PLTD vs. BULZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PLTD

PLTD Risk / Return Rank: 8
PLTD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
PLTD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
PLTD Omega Ratio Rank: 9
PLTD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
PLTD Martin Ratio Rank: 8

BULZ

BULZ Risk / Return Rank: 59
BULZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
BULZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
BULZ Omega Ratio Rank: 54
BULZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
BULZ Martin Ratio Rank: 51

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PLTD vs. BULZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily PLTR Bear 1X Shares (PLTD) and MicroSectors FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETNs (BULZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PLTD	BULZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.08	2.24	-2.32
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.26	2.44	-2.18
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.03	1.32	-0.29
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.11	3.26	-3.37
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.17	8.46	-8.64

PLTD vs. BULZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PLTD Sharpe Ratio is -0.08, which is lower than the BULZ Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PLTD and BULZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PLTD vs. BULZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PLTD drawdown since its inception was -77.34%, smaller than the maximum BULZ drawdown of -94.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLTD and BULZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	PLTD	BULZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-77.34%	-94.44%	+17.10%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-39.15%	-54.22%	+15.07%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-67.96%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-65.72%	-24.05%	-41.67%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-59.57%	-58.04%	-1.53%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	23.83%	20.87%	+2.96%

Volatility

PLTD vs. BULZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Direxion Daily PLTR Bear 1X Shares (PLTD) is 19.54%, while MicroSectors FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETNs (BULZ) has a volatility of 33.09%. This indicates that PLTD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BULZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PLTD	BULZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	19.54%	33.09%	-13.55%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	38.54%	62.60%	-24.06%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	51.70%	79.22%	-27.52%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	63.33%	91.72%	-28.39%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	63.33%	91.72%	-28.39%

PLTD vs. BULZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

PLTD has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than BULZ's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

PLTD vs. BULZ - Dividend Comparison

PLTD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.76%, while BULZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
BULZ MicroSectors FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETNs	0.00%	0.00%
PLTD Direxion Daily PLTR Bear 1X Shares	2.76%	5.17%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PLTD and BULZ in my portfolio?

PLTD and BULZ have a correlation of -0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PLTD or BULZ?

BULZ has higher volatility (33.09%) compared to PLTD (19.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PLTD dropped -77.34% vs BULZ's -94.44%.

Which ETF is better, PLTD or BULZ?

On 1-year performance, BULZ leads with 175.88% vs -4.09% for PLTD. On fees, BULZ is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, PLTD has been the lower-risk option at 19.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PLTD or BULZ?

Over the 1-year period, BULZ has performed better with a 175.88% return vs -4.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PLTD or BULZ?

BULZ is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for PLTD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PLTD or BULZ?

PLTD has the higher dividend yield at 2.76%, compared with 0.00% for BULZ.

What is the main difference between PLTD and BULZ?

PLTD is categorized as Inverse Equities, while BULZ is Leveraged Equities. PLTD tracks Palantir Technologies Inc. (-100%), while BULZ tracks Solactive FANG Innovation Index (300%). They also come from different issuers: Direxion and BMO. Their fees differ too: 0.98% for PLTD and 0.95% for BULZ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BULZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs -0.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.