PLT vs. TCAL
PLT (Defiance Leveraged Long + Income PLTR ETF) and TCAL (T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Premium Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.05, they often move in opposite directions. PLT charges 1.51%/yr vs 0.34%/yr for TCAL.
Performance
PLT vs. TCAL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PLT achieves a -11.99% return, which is significantly lower than TCAL's -2.88% return.
PLT
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- -11.99%
- 6M
- -11.81%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TCAL
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- -1.26%
- YTD
- -2.88%
- 6M
- -2.97%
- 1Y
- -1.87%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PLT vs. TCAL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PLT Defiance Leveraged Long + Income PLTR ETF | -11.99% | 13.15% |
TCAL T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Premium Income ETF | -2.88% | -1.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between PLT and TCAL is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2025 | -0.05 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PLT vs. TCAL — Risk / Return Rank
PLT
TCAL
PLT vs. TCAL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Leveraged Long + Income PLTR ETF (PLT) and T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Premium Income ETF (TCAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PLT | TCAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | -0.20 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.01 | -0.10 | +0.09 |
Drawdowns
PLT vs. TCAL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PLT drawdown since its inception was -43.74%, which is greater than TCAL's maximum drawdown of -7.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLT and TCAL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PLT | TCAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.74% | -7.24% | -36.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.00% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -38.06% | -5.92% | -32.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.60% | -2.02% | -23.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.67% | — |
Volatility
PLT vs. TCAL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PLT | TCAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.46% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.08% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 60.67% | 9.31% | +51.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 60.67% | 11.25% | +49.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 60.67% | 11.25% | +49.42% |
PLT vs. TCAL - Expense Ratio Comparison
PLT has a 1.51% expense ratio, which is higher than TCAL's 0.34% expense ratio.
Dividends
PLT vs. TCAL - Dividend Comparison
PLT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 38.02%, more than TCAL's 11.96% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
PLT Defiance Leveraged Long + Income PLTR ETF | 38.02% | 29.28% |
TCAL T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Premium Income ETF | 11.96% | 8.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PLT and TCAL have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TCAL is cheaper at 0.34% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TCAL is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 1.51% for PLT.
PLT has the higher dividend yield at 38.02%, compared with 11.96% for TCAL.
They also come from different issuers: Defiance and T. Rowe Price. Their fees differ too: 1.51% for PLT and 0.34% for TCAL.
Find the right allocation for PLT and TCAL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer