PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PLT vs. AIPO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PLT vs. AIPO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Leveraged Long + Income PLTR ETF (PLT) and Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF (AIPO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PLT achieves a -11.99% return, which is significantly lower than AIPO's 52.03% return.


PLT

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
-11.99%
6M
-11.81%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AIPO

1D
-1.12%
1M
6.63%
YTD
52.03%
6M
45.92%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PLT vs. AIPO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between PLT and AIPO is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2025

0.37

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PLT vs. AIPO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Leveraged Long + Income PLTR ETF (PLT) and Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF (AIPO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

PLT vs. AIPO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PLTAIPODifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.01

2.36

-2.37

Drawdowns

PLT vs. AIPO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PLT drawdown since its inception was -43.74%, which is greater than AIPO's maximum drawdown of -17.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLT and AIPO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PLTAIPODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.74%

-17.31%

-26.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-38.06%

-1.12%

-36.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.60%

-4.38%

-21.22%

Volatility

PLT vs. AIPO - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PLTAIPODifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

60.67%

34.09%

+26.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

60.67%

34.09%

+26.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

60.67%

34.09%

+26.58%

PLT vs. AIPO - Expense Ratio Comparison

PLT has a 1.51% expense ratio, which is higher than AIPO's 0.69% expense ratio.


Dividends

PLT vs. AIPO - Dividend Comparison

PLT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 38.02%, more than AIPO's 0.01% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


PLT and AIPO have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, AIPO is cheaper at 0.69% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AIPO is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 1.51% for PLT.

PLT has the higher dividend yield at 38.02%, compared with 0.01% for AIPO.

PLT is categorized as Derivative Income, while AIPO is Technology Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.51% for PLT and 0.69% for AIPO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PLT and AIPO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer