PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PLOO vs. NVDO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PLOO vs. NVDO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated PLTR Monthly ETF (PLOO) and Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF (NVDO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PLOO achieves a -11.52% return, which is significantly lower than NVDO's 18.85% return.


PLOO

1D
-6.42%
1M
2.35%
YTD
-11.52%
6M
-4.98%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NVDO

1D
-2.46%
1M
14.15%
YTD
18.85%
6M
29.58%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PLOO vs. NVDO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between PLOO and NVDO is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 14, 2025

0.40

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PLOO vs. NVDO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated PLTR Monthly ETF (PLOO) and Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF (NVDO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

PLOO vs. NVDO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PLOONVDODifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.20

1.30

-1.51

Drawdowns

PLOO vs. NVDO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PLOO drawdown since its inception was -33.59%, which is greater than NVDO's maximum drawdown of -16.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLOO and NVDO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PLOONVDODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.59%

-16.25%

-17.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.05%

-2.68%

-16.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.80%

-4.99%

-10.81%

Volatility

PLOO vs. NVDO - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PLOONVDODifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

50.33%

31.93%

+18.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

50.33%

31.93%

+18.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

50.33%

31.93%

+18.40%

PLOO vs. NVDO - Expense Ratio Comparison

PLOO has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than NVDO's 0.77% expense ratio.


Dividends

PLOO vs. NVDO - Dividend Comparison

PLOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 25.79%, more than NVDO's 14.02% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


PLOO and NVDO have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, NVDO is cheaper at 0.77% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

NVDO is cheaper with a 0.77% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for PLOO.

PLOO has the higher dividend yield at 25.79%, compared with 14.02% for NVDO.

Their fees differ too: 0.80% for PLOO and 0.77% for NVDO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PLOO and NVDO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer