PLJIX vs. FOTKX

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Principal LifeTime 2065 (PLJIX) and Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund Class K6 (FOTKX).

PLJIX is managed by Principal. It was launched on Sep 5, 2017. FOTKX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Oct 17, 1996.

Performance

PLJIX vs. FOTKX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal LifeTime 2065 (PLJIX) and Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund Class K6 (FOTKX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

PLJIX vs. FOTKX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PLJIX Principal LifeTime 2065	-5.23%	17.76%	15.83%	20.27%	-18.82%	18.18%	16.87%	27.36%	-9.36%	7.78%
FOTKX Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund Class K6	-0.61%	11.66%	5.55%	9.97%	-13.05%	5.68%	11.29%	14.46%	-3.65%	3.45%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PLJIX achieves a -5.23% return, which is significantly lower than FOTKX's -0.61% return.

PLJIX

• 1D: -0.27%
• 1M: -8.32%
• YTD: -5.23%
• 6M: -3.02%
• 1Y: 12.48%
• 3Y*: 13.60%
• 5Y*: 7.16%
• 10Y*: —

FOTKX

• 1D: 0.21%
• 1M: -3.83%
• YTD: -0.61%
• 6M: 1.01%
• 1Y: 8.62%
• 3Y*: 7.30%
• 5Y*: 3.28%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PLJIX vs. FOTKX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PLJIX has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than FOTKX's 0.38% expense ratio.

FOTKX

Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund Class K6

PLJIX

Principal LifeTime 2065

Return for Risk

PLJIX vs. FOTKX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PLJIX

PLJIX Risk / Return Rank: 38
PLJIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
PLJIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
PLJIX Omega Ratio Rank: 37
PLJIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
PLJIX Martin Ratio Rank: 45

FOTKX

FOTKX Risk / Return Rank: 84
FOTKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
FOTKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
FOTKX Omega Ratio Rank: 82
FOTKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
FOTKX Martin Ratio Rank: 85

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PLJIX vs. FOTKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal LifeTime 2065 (PLJIX) and Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund Class K6 (FOTKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PLJIX	FOTKX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.80	1.60	-0.80
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.24	2.21	-0.97
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.33	-0.15
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.94	2.12	-1.19
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.57	8.66	-4.09
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PLJIX vs. FOTKX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PLJIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.80, which is lower than the FOTKX Sharpe Ratio of 1.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PLJIX and FOTKX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PLJIX	FOTKX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.80	1.60	-0.80
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.47	0.52	-0.05
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.57	0.77	-0.21

Correlation

The correlation between PLJIX and FOTKX is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

PLJIX vs. FOTKX - Dividend Comparison

PLJIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.25%, more than FOTKX's 5.28% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PLJIX Principal LifeTime 2065	7.25%	6.88%	6.05%	3.59%	6.54%	3.83%	2.45%	3.83%	3.34%	1.87%
FOTKX Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund Class K6	5.28%	5.25%	3.32%	2.98%	7.41%	9.53%	6.17%	6.00%	7.24%	3.57%

Drawdowns

PLJIX vs. FOTKX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PLJIX drawdown since its inception was -34.13%, which is greater than FOTKX's maximum drawdown of -18.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLJIX and FOTKX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PLJIX	FOTKX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.13%	-18.29%	-15.84%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.48%	-4.03%	-7.45%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.81%	-18.29%	-8.52%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.72%	-3.83%	-4.89%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.69%	-3.62%	-2.07%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.35%	0.99%	+1.36%

Volatility

PLJIX vs. FOTKX - Volatility Comparison

Principal LifeTime 2065 (PLJIX) has a higher volatility of 4.98% compared to Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund Class K6 (FOTKX) at 2.34%. This indicates that PLJIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FOTKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PLJIX	FOTKX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.98%	2.34%	+2.64%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.89%	3.45%	+5.44%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.75%	5.48%	+10.27%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.32%	6.32%	+9.00%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.77%	6.41%	+10.36%