PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PLHHX vs. FNSHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PLHHX vs. FNSHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2065 Fund (PLHHX) and Fidelity Freedom Income Fund Class K (FNSHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PLHHX achieves a 8.52% return, which is significantly higher than FNSHX's 4.13% return.


PLHHX

1D
-1.88%
1M
-0.36%
YTD
8.52%
6M
7.66%
1Y
22.00%
3Y*
18.51%
5Y*
9.74%
10Y*

FNSHX

1D
-0.77%
1M
0.39%
YTD
4.13%
6M
3.98%
1Y
9.42%
3Y*
7.71%
5Y*
3.05%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PLHHX vs. FNSHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PLHHX
Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2065 Fund
8.52%19.91%17.00%20.33%-18.53%20.30%16.50%27.02%-10.19%7.77%
FNSHX
Fidelity Freedom Income Fund Class K
4.13%10.35%4.40%8.26%-11.31%3.16%9.01%10.74%-1.86%-0.51%

Correlation

The correlation between PLHHX and FNSHX is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 6, 2017

0.69

The correlation between PLHHX and FNSHX shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (5 years) to 0.82 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PLHHX vs. FNSHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PLHHX
PLHHX Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
PLHHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLHHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLHHX Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
PLHHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLHHX Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

FNSHX
FNSHX Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
FNSHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNSHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNSHX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
FNSHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNSHX Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PLHHX vs. FNSHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2065 Fund (PLHHX) and Fidelity Freedom Income Fund Class K (FNSHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PLHHXFNSHXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.39

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.73

2.69

+0.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.11

11.49

+0.62

PLHHX vs. FNSHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PLHHX Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is comparable to the FNSHX Sharpe Ratio of 1.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PLHHX and FNSHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PLHHX vs. FNSHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PLHHX drawdown since its inception was -33.47%, which is greater than FNSHX's maximum drawdown of -15.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLHHX and FNSHX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PLHHXFNSHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.47%

-15.87%

-17.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.64%

-3.68%

-4.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.62%

-4.89%

-11.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.44%

-15.87%

-9.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.81%

-0.93%

-1.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.37%

-3.02%

-2.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.95%

0.86%

+1.09%

Volatility

PLHHX vs. FNSHX - Volatility Comparison

Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2065 Fund (PLHHX) has a higher volatility of 5.40% compared to Fidelity Freedom Income Fund Class K (FNSHX) at 2.38%. This indicates that PLHHX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNSHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PLHHXFNSHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.40%

2.38%

+3.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.62%

4.43%

+6.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.87%

5.07%

+7.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.65%

5.44%

+10.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.84%

4.88%

+11.96%

PLHHX vs. FNSHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PLHHX has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than FNSHX's 0.42% expense ratio.


Dividends

PLHHX vs. FNSHX - Dividend Comparison

PLHHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.58%, more than FNSHX's 2.99% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FNSHX
Fidelity Freedom Income Fund Class K
2.99%3.21%3.19%2.98%5.94%6.17%4.43%3.74%5.22%0.00%
PLHHX
Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2065 Fund
3.58%3.88%4.03%2.64%7.08%2.27%2.00%1.65%3.49%1.87%

Frequently Asked Questions


PLHHX and FNSHX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PLHHX has higher volatility (5.40%) compared to FNSHX (2.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PLHHX dropped -33.47% vs FNSHX's -15.87%.

FNSHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PLHHX and FNSHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer