PLGIX vs. PLTNX
Compare and contrast key facts about Principal LargeCap Growth Fund I (PLGIX) and Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2055 Fund (PLTNX).
PLGIX is managed by Principal. It was launched on Dec 6, 2000. PLTNX is managed by Principal. It was launched on Sep 29, 2014.
Performance
PLGIX vs. PLTNX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PLGIX vs. PLTNX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PLGIX Principal LargeCap Growth Fund I | -11.60% | 11.59% | 83.01% | 40.40% | -34.05% | 21.49% | 36.06% | 34.89% | 3.44% | 33.67% |
PLTNX Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2055 Fund | -1.70% | 19.89% | 17.25% | 20.33% | -18.49% | 19.70% | 15.78% | 26.17% | -9.84% | 21.03% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PLGIX achieves a -11.60% return, which is significantly lower than PLTNX's -1.70% return. Over the past 10 years, PLGIX has outperformed PLTNX with an annualized return of 18.23%, while PLTNX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.80% annualized return.
PLGIX
- 1D
- 3.89%
- 1M
- -5.53%
- YTD
- -11.60%
- 6M
- -11.98%
- 1Y
- 6.58%
- 3Y*
- 30.95%
- 5Y*
- 14.58%
- 10Y*
- 18.23%
PLTNX
- 1D
- 2.96%
- 1M
- -5.09%
- YTD
- -1.70%
- 6M
- 0.75%
- 1Y
- 19.23%
- 3Y*
- 15.98%
- 5Y*
- 8.62%
- 10Y*
- 10.80%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PLGIX vs. PLTNX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PLGIX has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is higher than PLTNX's 0.05% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PLGIX vs. PLTNX — Risk / Return Rank
PLGIX
PLTNX
PLGIX vs. PLTNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal LargeCap Growth Fund I (PLGIX) and Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2055 Fund (PLTNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PLGIX | PLTNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.34 | 1.21 | -0.87 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.66 | 1.81 | -1.15 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.26 | -0.17 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.41 | 1.67 | -1.26 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.36 | 8.28 | -6.93 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PLGIX | PLTNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 | 1.21 | -0.87 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 | 0.56 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.72 | 0.69 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.62 | -0.20 |
Correlation
The correlation between PLGIX and PLTNX is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
PLGIX vs. PLTNX - Dividend Comparison
PLGIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.35%, more than PLTNX's 4.67% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PLGIX Principal LargeCap Growth Fund I | 16.35% | 14.45% | 63.77% | 5.99% | 11.57% | 11.34% | 7.03% | 8.01% | 16.41% | 7.05% | 4.64% | 12.51% |
PLTNX Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2055 Fund | 4.67% | 4.59% | 4.40% | 2.84% | 9.11% | 4.23% | 3.11% | 3.47% | 4.68% | 2.21% | 1.99% | 1.63% |
Drawdowns
PLGIX vs. PLTNX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PLGIX drawdown since its inception was -55.43%, which is greater than PLTNX's maximum drawdown of -32.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLGIX and PLTNX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PLGIX | PLTNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.43% | -32.71% | -22.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.32% | -11.90% | -6.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.63% | -25.48% | -15.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.63% | -32.71% | -7.92% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.14% | -5.96% | -9.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.31% | -4.83% | -8.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.53% | 2.39% | +3.14% |
Volatility
PLGIX vs. PLTNX - Volatility Comparison
Principal LargeCap Growth Fund I (PLGIX) has a higher volatility of 6.91% compared to Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2055 Fund (PLTNX) at 6.01%. This indicates that PLGIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PLTNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PLGIX | PLTNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.91% | 6.01% | +0.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.32% | 9.53% | +2.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.61% | 16.43% | +5.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.14% | 15.45% | +14.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.41% | 15.80% | +9.61% |