PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PLGIX vs. PBCKX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PLGIX vs. PBCKX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal LargeCap Growth Fund I (PLGIX) and Principal Blue Chip Fund (PBCKX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PLGIX achieves a 6.11% return, which is significantly higher than PBCKX's 0.26% return. Over the past 10 years, PLGIX has outperformed PBCKX with an annualized return of 20.21%, while PBCKX has yielded a comparatively lower 16.51% annualized return.


PLGIX

1D
-0.29%
1M
6.85%
YTD
6.11%
6M
5.10%
1Y
15.54%
3Y*
35.60%
5Y*
18.09%
10Y*
20.21%

PBCKX

1D
-1.41%
1M
2.22%
YTD
0.26%
6M
0.06%
1Y
4.52%
3Y*
18.79%
5Y*
9.06%
10Y*
16.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PLGIX vs. PBCKX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PLGIX
Principal LargeCap Growth Fund I
6.11%11.59%83.01%40.40%-34.05%21.49%36.06%34.89%3.44%33.67%
PBCKX
Principal Blue Chip Fund
0.26%9.20%26.90%40.58%-30.74%25.05%34.77%45.22%2.83%28.85%

Correlation

The correlation between PLGIX and PBCKX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2012

0.95

The correlation between PLGIX and PBCKX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PLGIX vs. PBCKX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PLGIX
PLGIX Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
PLGIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLGIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLGIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
PLGIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLGIX Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

PBCKX
PBCKX Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
PBCKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PBCKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
PBCKX Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
PBCKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
PBCKX Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PLGIX vs. PBCKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal LargeCap Growth Fund I (PLGIX) and Principal Blue Chip Fund (PBCKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PLGIXPBCKXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.98

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.07

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.88

0.26

+0.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.73

0.79

+1.95

PLGIX vs. PBCKX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PLGIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.06, which is higher than the PBCKX Sharpe Ratio of 0.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PLGIX and PBCKX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PLGIXPBCKXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.06

0.33

+0.73

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

0.45

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

0.82

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.86

-0.41

Drawdowns

PLGIX vs. PBCKX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PLGIX drawdown since its inception was -55.43%, which is greater than PBCKX's maximum drawdown of -38.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLGIX and PBCKX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PLGIXPBCKXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.43%

-38.00%

-17.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.32%

-19.10%

+0.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.39%

-19.10%

-2.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.63%

-38.00%

-2.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.63%

-38.00%

-2.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.29%

-3.54%

+3.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.26%

-5.65%

-7.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.90%

6.26%

-0.36%

Volatility

PLGIX vs. PBCKX - Volatility Comparison

Principal LargeCap Growth Fund I (PLGIX) and Principal Blue Chip Fund (PBCKX) have volatilities of 3.61% and 3.67%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PLGIXPBCKXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.61%

3.67%

-0.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.06%

12.17%

-0.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.25%

15.12%

+0.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.12%

20.35%

+9.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.44%

20.21%

+5.23%

PLGIX vs. PBCKX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PLGIX has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is higher than PBCKX's 0.66% expense ratio.


Dividends

PLGIX vs. PBCKX - Dividend Comparison

PLGIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.62%, less than PBCKX's 19.89% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PBCKX
Principal Blue Chip Fund
19.89%19.94%9.01%0.51%0.71%6.67%3.28%8.90%7.86%2.79%1.01%2.40%
PLGIX
Principal LargeCap Growth Fund I
13.62%14.45%63.77%5.99%11.57%11.34%7.03%8.01%16.41%7.05%4.64%12.51%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, PLGIX and PBCKX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

PBCKX has higher volatility (3.67%) compared to PLGIX (3.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PLGIX dropped -55.43% vs PBCKX's -38.00%.

PLGIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.06 vs 0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PLGIX and PBCKX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer