PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PLGIX vs. LTIUX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PLGIX vs. LTIUX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal LargeCap Growth Fund I (PLGIX) and Principal LifeTime 2035 Fund (LTIUX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PLGIX achieves a 2.68% return, which is significantly lower than LTIUX's 6.25% return. Over the past 10 years, PLGIX has outperformed LTIUX with an annualized return of 19.71%, while LTIUX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.38% annualized return.


PLGIX

1D
0.49%
1M
0.61%
6M
3.85%
YTD
2.68%
1Y
6.69%
3Y*
31.22%
5Y*
15.29%
10Y*
19.71%

LTIUX

1D
0.28%
1M
-0.00%
6M
4.21%
YTD
6.25%
1Y
13.53%
3Y*
13.26%
5Y*
6.76%
10Y*
9.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PLGIX vs. LTIUX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PLGIX
Principal LargeCap Growth Fund I
2.68%11.59%83.01%40.40%-34.05%21.49%36.06%34.89%3.44%33.67%
LTIUX
Principal LifeTime 2035 Fund
6.25%14.26%14.13%16.51%-17.48%14.07%15.70%23.48%-7.37%19.69%

Correlation

The correlation between PLGIX and LTIUX is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 3, 2008

0.91

The correlation between PLGIX and LTIUX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PLGIX vs. LTIUX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PLGIX
PLGIX Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
PLGIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLGIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLGIX Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
PLGIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLGIX Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

LTIUX
LTIUX Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
LTIUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LTIUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
LTIUX Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
LTIUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
LTIUX Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PLGIX vs. LTIUX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal LargeCap Growth Fund I (PLGIX) and Principal LifeTime 2035 Fund (LTIUX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PLGIXLTIUXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.27

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.37

2.02

-1.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.11

8.72

-7.61

PLGIX vs. LTIUX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PLGIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.41, which is lower than the LTIUX Sharpe Ratio of 1.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PLGIX and LTIUX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PLGIX vs. LTIUX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PLGIX drawdown since its inception was -55.43%, which is greater than LTIUX's maximum drawdown of -49.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLGIX and LTIUX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PLGIXLTIUXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.43%

-49.65%

-5.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.32%

-6.57%

-11.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.39%

-11.08%

-10.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.63%

-24.23%

-16.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.63%

-28.12%

-12.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.52%

-0.49%

-3.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.22%

-6.67%

-6.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.14%

1.52%

+4.62%

Volatility

PLGIX vs. LTIUX - Volatility Comparison

Principal LargeCap Growth Fund I (PLGIX) has a higher volatility of 5.89% compared to Principal LifeTime 2035 Fund (LTIUX) at 2.64%. This indicates that PLGIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LTIUX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PLGIXLTIUXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.89%

2.64%

+3.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.68%

7.70%

+5.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.49%

9.19%

+7.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.27%

11.92%

+18.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.47%

12.42%

+13.05%

PLGIX vs. LTIUX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PLGIX has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is higher than LTIUX's 0.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

PLGIX vs. LTIUX - Dividend Comparison

PLGIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.08%, more than LTIUX's 8.50% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LTIUX
Principal LifeTime 2035 Fund
8.50%9.03%9.46%4.17%7.50%7.06%5.35%7.28%7.75%5.46%4.28%5.59%
PLGIX
Principal LargeCap Growth Fund I
14.08%14.45%63.77%5.99%11.57%11.34%7.03%8.01%16.41%7.05%4.64%12.51%

Frequently Asked Questions


PLGIX and LTIUX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PLGIX has higher volatility (5.89%) compared to LTIUX (2.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PLGIX dropped -55.43% vs LTIUX's -49.65%.

LTIUX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs 0.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PLGIX and LTIUX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer