PLGI vs. WAMA
PLGI (PL Growth and Income ETF) and WAMA (WisdomTree U.S. Adaptive Moving Average Fund) are both Tactical Allocation funds. PLGI is actively managed, while WAMA is passively managed. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PLGI charges 1.25%/yr vs 0.32%/yr for WAMA.
Performance
PLGI vs. WAMA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
PLGI
- 1D
- -0.69%
- 1M
- -2.14%
- YTD
- -3.60%
- 6M
- -4.09%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WAMA
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- -0.10%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PLGI vs. WAMA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
PLGI PL Growth and Income ETF | -3.85% |
WAMA WisdomTree U.S. Adaptive Moving Average Fund | 1.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between PLGI and WAMA is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 6, 2026 | 0.47 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PLGI vs. WAMA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PL Growth and Income ETF (PLGI) and WisdomTree U.S. Adaptive Moving Average Fund (WAMA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PLGI vs. WAMA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PLGI drawdown since its inception was -7.26%, which is greater than WAMA's maximum drawdown of -4.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLGI and WAMA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PLGI | WAMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.26% | -4.37% | -2.89% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.63% | -2.01% | -3.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.71% | -1.06% | -1.65% |
Volatility
PLGI vs. WAMA - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PLGI | WAMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.55% | 14.02% | -1.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.55% | 14.02% | -1.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.55% | 14.02% | -1.47% |
PLGI vs. WAMA - Expense Ratio Comparison
PLGI has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is higher than WAMA's 0.32% expense ratio.
Dividends
PLGI vs. WAMA - Dividend Comparison
PLGI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, while WAMA has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
PLGI PL Growth and Income ETF | 0.02% |
WAMA WisdomTree U.S. Adaptive Moving Average Fund | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PLGI and WAMA have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, WAMA is cheaper at 0.32% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
WAMA is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 1.25% for PLGI.
PLGI has the higher dividend yield at 0.02%, compared with 0.00% for WAMA.
They also come from different issuers: Shalva Asset Management and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 1.25% for PLGI and 0.32% for WAMA.
Find the right allocation for PLGI and WAMA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer