PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PLGI vs. WAMA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PLGI vs. WAMA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PL Growth and Income ETF (PLGI) and WisdomTree U.S. Adaptive Moving Average Fund (WAMA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


PLGI

1D
-0.69%
1M
-2.14%
YTD
-3.60%
6M
-4.09%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

WAMA

1D
-0.58%
1M
-0.10%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PLGI vs. WAMA - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between PLGI and WAMA is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 6, 2026

0.47

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PLGI vs. WAMA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PL Growth and Income ETF (PLGI) and WisdomTree U.S. Adaptive Moving Average Fund (WAMA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

PLGI vs. WAMA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PLGI vs. WAMA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PLGI drawdown since its inception was -7.26%, which is greater than WAMA's maximum drawdown of -4.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLGI and WAMA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PLGIWAMADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.26%

-4.37%

-2.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.63%

-2.01%

-3.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.71%

-1.06%

-1.65%

Volatility

PLGI vs. WAMA - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PLGIWAMADifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.55%

14.02%

-1.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.55%

14.02%

-1.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.55%

14.02%

-1.47%

PLGI vs. WAMA - Expense Ratio Comparison

PLGI has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is higher than WAMA's 0.32% expense ratio.


Dividends

PLGI vs. WAMA - Dividend Comparison

PLGI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, while WAMA has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


PLGI and WAMA have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, WAMA is cheaper at 0.32% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

WAMA is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 1.25% for PLGI.

PLGI has the higher dividend yield at 0.02%, compared with 0.00% for WAMA.

They also come from different issuers: Shalva Asset Management and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 1.25% for PLGI and 0.32% for WAMA.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PLGI and WAMA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer