PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PLGI vs. TDSC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PLGI vs. TDSC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PL Growth and Income ETF (PLGI) and Cabana Target Drawdown 10 ETF (TDSC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PLGI achieves a -1.62% return, which is significantly lower than TDSC's 11.42% return.


PLGI

1D
-0.87%
1M
-1.54%
YTD
-1.62%
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TDSC

1D
-0.14%
1M
3.77%
YTD
11.42%
6M
10.93%
1Y
19.88%
3Y*
11.01%
5Y*
3.28%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PLGI vs. TDSC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
PLGI
PL Growth and Income ETF
-1.62%-0.98%
TDSC
Cabana Target Drawdown 10 ETF
11.42%-0.42%

Correlation

The correlation between PLGI and TDSC is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2025

0.43

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PLGI vs. TDSC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PLGI

TDSC
TDSC Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
TDSC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TDSC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
TDSC Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
TDSC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
TDSC Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PLGI vs. TDSC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PL Growth and Income ETF (PLGI) and Cabana Target Drawdown 10 ETF (TDSC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

PLGI vs. TDSC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PLGITDSCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.42

0.41

-0.83

Drawdowns

PLGI vs. TDSC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PLGI drawdown since its inception was -7.26%, smaller than the maximum TDSC drawdown of -21.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLGI and TDSC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PLGITDSCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.26%

-21.51%

+14.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.69%

-0.14%

-3.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.59%

-9.38%

+6.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.37%

Volatility

PLGI vs. TDSC - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PLGITDSCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.74%

8.90%

+3.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.74%

10.28%

+2.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.74%

10.22%

+2.52%

PLGI vs. TDSC - Expense Ratio Comparison

PLGI has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is higher than TDSC's 0.69% expense ratio.


Dividends

PLGI vs. TDSC - Dividend Comparison

PLGI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, less than TDSC's 2.01% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
PLGI
PL Growth and Income ETF
0.02%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TDSC
Cabana Target Drawdown 10 ETF
2.01%2.92%2.06%2.06%1.76%1.11%0.54%

Frequently Asked Questions


PLGI and TDSC have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TDSC is cheaper at 0.69% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TDSC is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 1.25% for PLGI.

TDSC has the higher dividend yield at 2.01%, compared with 0.02% for PLGI.

They also come from different issuers: Shalva Asset Management and Exchange Traded Concepts. Their fees differ too: 1.25% for PLGI and 0.69% for TDSC.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PLGI and TDSC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer