PLFMX vs. PMAQX
PLFMX (Principal LargeCap S&P 500 Index Fund) and PMAQX (Principal MidCap R6) are both mutual funds - PLFMX is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index, while PMAQX is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Principal. Over the past 5 years, PLFMX returned 12.37%/yr vs 4.67%/yr for PMAQX. Their correlation of 0.85 means they have usually moved in the same direction. PLFMX charges 0.72%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for PMAQX.
Performance
PLFMX vs. PMAQX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PLFMX achieves a 9.70% return, which is significantly higher than PMAQX's -2.73% return.
PLFMX
- 1D
- 0.71%
- 1M
- 0.08%
- 6M
- 7.62%
- YTD
- 9.70%
- 1Y
- 20.72%
- 3Y*
- 19.19%
- 5Y*
- 12.37%
- 10Y*
- 14.49%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.11%
PMAQX
- 1D
- 1.76%
- 1M
- 0.41%
- 6M
- 0.22%
- YTD
- -2.73%
- 1Y
- -8.09%
- 3Y*
- 10.29%
- 5Y*
- 4.67%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 12.38%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
PMAQX Principal MidCap R6 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
PLFMX vs. PMAQX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PLFMX Principal LargeCap S&P 500 Index Fund | 9.70% | 17.10% | 26.06% | 25.27% | -18.67% | 27.57% | 17.46% | 30.58% | -5.14% | 20.96% |
PMAQX Principal MidCap R6 | -2.73% | 1.71% | 23.74% | 26.02% | -23.09% | 25.29% | 18.38% | 49.59% | -6.79% | 24.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between PLFMX and PMAQX is 0.56, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.56 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.73 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017 | 0.85 |
Over the past year, the correlation between PLFMX and PMAQX has dropped to 0.56 - well below their long-term average of 0.85, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PLFMX vs. PMAQX — Risk / Return Rank
PLFMX
PMAQX
PLFMX vs. PMAQX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal LargeCap S&P 500 Index Fund (PLFMX) and Principal MidCap R6 (PMAQX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PLFMX | PMAQX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.88 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 0.94 | +0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.10 | -0.33 | +2.43 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.95 | -0.65 | +9.60 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PLFMX vs. PMAQX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PLFMX drawdown since its inception was -55.62%, which is greater than PMAQX's maximum drawdown of -40.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLFMX and PMAQX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PLFMX | PMAQX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.62% | -40.56% | -15.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.00% | -19.25% | +10.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.83% | -19.25% | +0.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.91% | -31.10% | +6.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.80% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.52% | -9.05% | +7.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.94% | -6.89% | -3.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.11% | 9.83% | -7.72% |
Volatility
PLFMX vs. PMAQX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Principal LargeCap S&P 500 Index Fund (PLFMX) is 3.51%, while Principal MidCap R6 (PMAQX) has a volatility of 5.29%. This indicates that PLFMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PMAQX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PLFMX | PMAQX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.51% | 5.29% | -1.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.12% | 12.15% | -2.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.88% | 15.26% | -2.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.03% | 18.76% | -1.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.49% | 19.43% | -1.94% |
PLFMX vs. PMAQX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PLFMX has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is higher than PMAQX's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
PLFMX vs. PMAQX - Dividend Comparison
PLFMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.19%, less than PMAQX's 5.96% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PLFMX Principal LargeCap S&P 500 Index Fund | 2.19% | 2.41% | 3.77% | 3.62% | 2.28% | 13.02% | 7.02% | 3.28% | 6.80% | 6.44% | 2.66% | 2.07% |
PMAQX Principal MidCap R6 | 5.96% | 5.80% | 6.46% | 2.58% | 3.18% | 7.96% | 1.08% | 9.14% | 12.39% | 3.39% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PLFMX and PMAQX have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PMAQX has higher volatility (5.29%) compared to PLFMX (3.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PLFMX dropped -55.62% vs PMAQX's -40.56%.
PLFMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.47 vs -0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PLFMX and PMAQX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer