PLA vs. ACYS
PLA (GraniteShares Autocallable PLTR ETF) and ACYS (FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PLA charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for ACYS.
Performance
PLA vs. ACYS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
PLA
- 1D
- 0.63%
- 1M
- 2.79%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
ACYS
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 0.06%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
PLA vs. ACYS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
PLA GraniteShares Autocallable PLTR ETF | 1.66% |
ACYS FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF | 1.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between PLA and ACYS is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 19, 2026 | 0.27 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PLA vs. ACYS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares Autocallable PLTR ETF (PLA) and FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF (ACYS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PLA vs. ACYS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PLA drawdown since its inception was -12.39%, which is greater than ACYS's maximum drawdown of -0.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLA and ACYS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PLA | ACYS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.39% | -0.63% | -11.76% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.90% | -0.34% | -2.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.36% | -0.14% | -4.22% |
Volatility
PLA vs. ACYS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PLA | ACYS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.73% | 3.36% | +19.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.73% | 3.36% | +19.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.73% | 3.36% | +19.37% |
PLA vs. ACYS - Expense Ratio Comparison
PLA has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than ACYS's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
PLA vs. ACYS - Dividend Comparison
PLA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.55%, more than ACYS's 0.61% yield.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
ACYS FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF | 0.61% |
PLA GraniteShares Autocallable PLTR ETF | 3.55% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PLA and ACYS have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ACYS is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ACYS is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for PLA.
PLA has the higher dividend yield at 3.55%, compared with 0.61% for ACYS.
They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for PLA and 0.75% for ACYS.
Find the right allocation for PLA and ACYS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer