PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PL vs. IONQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

PL vs. IONQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Planet Labs PBC (PL) and IonQ, Inc. (IONQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PL achieves a 57.96% return, which is significantly higher than IONQ's 28.93% return.


PL

1D
-8.84%
1M
-23.54%
YTD
57.96%
6M
70.78%
1Y
470.51%
3Y*
106.65%
5Y*
25.63%
10Y*

IONQ

1D
-0.24%
1M
4.69%
YTD
28.93%
6M
14.90%
1Y
49.44%
3Y*
75.90%
5Y*
40.49%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PL vs. IONQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
PL
Planet Labs PBC
57.96%388.12%63.56%-43.22%-29.27%-37.24%
IONQ
IonQ, Inc.
28.93%7.42%237.13%259.13%-79.34%59.20%

Correlation

The correlation between PL and IONQ is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 26, 2021

0.50

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PL:

$10.76B

IONQ:

$21.48B

EPS

PL:

-$1.17

IONQ:

$0.86

PS Ratio

PL:

29.61

IONQ:

99.37

PB Ratio

PL:

24.26

IONQ:

4.32

Total Revenue (TTM)

PL:

$335.61M

IONQ:

$187.12M

Gross Profit (TTM)

PL:

$186.28M

IONQ:

$71.25M

EBITDA (TTM)

PL:

-$125.70M

IONQ:

$405.86M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PL vs. IONQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PL
PL Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
PL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
PL Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
PL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
PL Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

IONQ
IONQ Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
IONQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IONQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
IONQ Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
IONQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
IONQ Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PL vs. IONQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Planet Labs PBC (PL) and IonQ, Inc. (IONQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PLIONQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+4.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.55

1.16

+0.39

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

11.79

0.73

+11.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

36.80

1.33

+35.47

PL vs. IONQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PL Sharpe Ratio is 4.62, which is higher than the IONQ Sharpe Ratio of 0.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PL and IONQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PL vs. IONQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PL drawdown since its inception was -85.73%, roughly equal to the maximum IONQ drawdown of -90.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PL and IONQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PLIONQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-85.73%

-90.00%

+4.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-40.23%

-67.61%

+27.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-55.17%

-67.61%

+12.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-85.73%

-90.00%

+4.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-39.40%

-29.53%

-9.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-49.90%

-50.88%

+0.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.88%

37.20%

-24.32%

Volatility

PL vs. IONQ - Volatility Comparison

Planet Labs PBC (PL) has a higher volatility of 39.48% compared to IonQ, Inc. (IONQ) at 31.60%. This indicates that PL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IONQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PLIONQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

39.48%

31.60%

+7.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

78.71%

68.80%

+9.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

102.61%

93.28%

+9.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

80.98%

100.48%

-19.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

79.91%

97.53%

-17.62%

Dividends

PL vs. IONQ - Dividend Comparison

Neither PL nor IONQ has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

PL vs. IONQ - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Planet Labs PBC and IonQ, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00M40.00M60.00M80.00M100.00M20222023202420252026
94.15M
64.67M
(PL) Total Revenue
(IONQ) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


PL and IONQ have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PL has higher volatility (39.48%) compared to IONQ (31.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PL dropped -85.73% vs IONQ's -90.00%.

PL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.62 vs 0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PL and IONQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer