PKW vs. WTV
PKW (Invesco BuyBack Achievers™ ETF) and WTV (WisdomTree US Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PKW is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ US BuyBack Achievers Index, while WTV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the WisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PKW returned 9.90%/yr vs 13.17%/yr for WTV. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PKW charges 0.62%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for WTV.
Performance
PKW vs. WTV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PKW achieves a 2.43% return, which is significantly lower than WTV's 10.52% return.
PKW
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- -0.04%
- YTD
- 2.43%
- 6M
- 3.41%
- 1Y
- 16.01%
- 3Y*
- 18.60%
- 5Y*
- 9.90%
- 10Y*
- 12.81%
WTV
- 1D
- -0.96%
- 1M
- 4.55%
- YTD
- 10.52%
- 6M
- 11.62%
- 1Y
- 23.33%
- 3Y*
- 22.34%
- 5Y*
- 13.17%
- 10Y*
- —
PKW vs. WTV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PKW Invesco BuyBack Achievers™ ETF | 2.43% | 17.92% | 17.33% | 17.24% | -10.21% | 32.62% | 8.41% | 34.09% | -10.53% | 0.53% |
WTV WisdomTree US Value ETF | 10.52% | 13.51% | 23.99% | 22.35% | -8.06% | 30.59% | 6.15% | 29.69% | -8.29% | 1.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between PKW and WTV is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2017 | 0.92 |
The correlation between PKW and WTV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
PKW vs. WTV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PKW
WTV
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Energy
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Financial Services
PKW
WTV
Consumer Cyclical
PKW
WTV
Industrials
PKW
WTV
Technology
PKW
WTV
Healthcare
PKW
WTV
Energy
PKW
WTV
Communication Services
PKW
WTV
Consumer Defensive
PKW
WTV
Utilities
PKW
WTV
Basic Materials
PKW
WTV
Real Estate
PKW
WTV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PKW vs. WTV — Risk / Return Rank
PKW
WTV
PKW vs. WTV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BuyBack Achievers™ ETF (PKW) and WisdomTree US Value ETF (WTV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PKW | WTV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.76 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.35 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.05 | 3.28 | -1.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.46 | 10.69 | -4.23 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PKW | WTV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.23 | 1.99 | -0.76 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 | 0.77 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.65 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.52 | 0.67 | -0.15 |
Drawdowns
PKW vs. WTV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PKW drawdown since its inception was -54.59%, which is greater than WTV's maximum drawdown of -42.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PKW and WTV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PKW | WTV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.59% | -42.18% | -12.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.86% | -7.15% | -0.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.91% | -18.49% | -2.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.51% | -19.30% | -4.21% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.93% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.15% | -0.96% | -1.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.96% | -5.06% | -2.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.49% | 2.19% | +0.30% |
Volatility
PKW vs. WTV - Volatility Comparison
Invesco BuyBack Achievers™ ETF (PKW) has a higher volatility of 3.18% compared to WisdomTree US Value ETF (WTV) at 3.02%. This indicates that PKW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WTV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PKW | WTV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.18% | 3.02% | +0.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.39% | 7.90% | +1.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.14% | 11.83% | +1.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.45% | 17.09% | +0.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.78% | 20.20% | -0.42% |
PKW vs. WTV - Expense Ratio Comparison
PKW has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is higher than WTV's 0.12% expense ratio.
Dividends
PKW vs. WTV - Dividend Comparison
PKW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%, less than WTV's 1.65% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PKW Invesco BuyBack Achievers™ ETF | 0.90% | 0.99% | 0.86% | 1.17% | 1.22% | 0.72% | 1.48% | 1.30% | 1.30% | 0.65% | 1.59% | 1.14% |
WTV WisdomTree US Value ETF | 1.65% | 1.59% | 1.54% | 1.62% | 2.08% | 1.55% | 1.63% | 1.44% | 1.94% | 0.41% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PKW and WTV have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PKW has higher volatility (3.18%) compared to WTV (3.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PKW dropped -54.59% vs WTV's -42.18%.
On 5-year performance, WTV leads with 13.17% vs 9.90% for PKW. On fees, WTV is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, WTV has been the lower-risk option at 3.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, WTV has performed better with a 13.17% return vs 9.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
WTV is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.62% for PKW.
WTV has the higher dividend yield at 1.65%, compared with 0.90% for PKW.
PKW is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while WTV is Large Cap Value Equities. PKW tracks NASDAQ US BuyBack Achievers Index, while WTV tracks WisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Value Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.62% for PKW and 0.12% for WTV.
WTV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PKW and WTV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer