PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PKBIX vs. PYSBX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PKBIX vs. PYSBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Payden/Kravitz Cash Balance Plan Fund (PKBIX) and Payden Low Duration Fund (PYSBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PKBIX achieves a 1.41% return, which is significantly higher than PYSBX's 0.52% return. Over the past 10 years, PKBIX has outperformed PYSBX with an annualized return of 3.60%, while PYSBX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.26% annualized return.


PKBIX

1D
-0.10%
1M
0.50%
YTD
1.41%
6M
1.97%
1Y
5.63%
3Y*
6.75%
5Y*
3.84%
10Y*
3.60%

PYSBX

1D
-0.10%
1M
0.18%
YTD
0.52%
6M
0.99%
1Y
3.83%
3Y*
4.76%
5Y*
2.39%
10Y*
2.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PKBIX vs. PYSBX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PKBIX
Payden/Kravitz Cash Balance Plan Fund
1.41%6.75%8.14%6.21%-3.89%3.97%1.89%6.36%0.79%3.19%
PYSBX
Payden Low Duration Fund
0.52%5.72%5.03%4.96%-3.40%-0.23%3.46%3.92%1.00%1.48%

Correlation

The correlation between PKBIX and PYSBX is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.40

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2008

0.35

Over the past year, PKBIX and PYSBX have become more correlated (0.62) than their long-term average of 0.35, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PKBIX vs. PYSBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PKBIX
PKBIX Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
PKBIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PKBIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
PKBIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
PKBIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
PKBIX Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

PYSBX
PYSBX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
PYSBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PYSBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
PYSBX Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
PYSBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
PYSBX Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PKBIX vs. PYSBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Payden/Kravitz Cash Balance Plan Fund (PKBIX) and Payden Low Duration Fund (PYSBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PKBIXPYSBXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.86

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.69

1.48

+0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.15

2.79

+0.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.38

10.05

+3.33

PKBIX vs. PYSBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PKBIX Sharpe Ratio is 3.03, which is higher than the PYSBX Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PKBIX and PYSBX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PKBIXPYSBXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.03

1.99

+1.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.48

1.13

+0.35

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.08

1.19

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.12

0.55

+0.57

Drawdowns

PKBIX vs. PYSBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PKBIX drawdown since its inception was -19.17%, which is greater than PYSBX's maximum drawdown of -6.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PKBIX and PYSBX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PKBIXPYSBXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.17%

-6.65%

-12.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.90%

-1.41%

-0.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.11%

-1.41%

-0.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-7.05%

-5.46%

-1.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.17%

-6.65%

-12.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.10%

-0.39%

+0.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.92%

-0.53%

-0.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.44%

0.39%

+0.05%

Volatility

PKBIX vs. PYSBX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Payden/Kravitz Cash Balance Plan Fund (PKBIX) is 0.56%, while Payden Low Duration Fund (PYSBX) has a volatility of 0.61%. This indicates that PKBIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PYSBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PKBIXPYSBXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.56%

0.61%

-0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.58%

1.47%

+0.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.97%

1.98%

-0.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.60%

2.13%

+0.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.33%

1.90%

+1.43%

PKBIX vs. PYSBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PKBIX has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is higher than PYSBX's 0.43% expense ratio.


Dividends

PKBIX vs. PYSBX - Dividend Comparison

PKBIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.14%, more than PYSBX's 4.40% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PKBIX
Payden/Kravitz Cash Balance Plan Fund
8.14%8.25%6.95%5.55%1.94%2.18%3.57%3.32%3.27%2.50%1.70%2.00%
PYSBX
Payden Low Duration Fund
4.40%4.32%4.27%2.93%1.87%1.06%2.50%2.14%2.30%1.57%1.24%1.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


PKBIX and PYSBX have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PYSBX has higher volatility (0.61%) compared to PKBIX (0.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PKBIX dropped -19.17% vs PYSBX's -6.65%.

PKBIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.03 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PKBIX and PYSBX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer