PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PKB vs. GDE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PKB vs. GDE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Dynamic Building & Construction ETF (PKB) and WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund (GDE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PKB achieves a 13.11% return, which is significantly higher than GDE's 9.79% return.


PKB

1D
0.48%
1M
-2.15%
YTD
13.11%
6M
10.44%
1Y
34.15%
3Y*
29.75%
5Y*
15.65%
10Y*
15.37%

GDE

1D
-1.35%
1M
1.88%
YTD
9.79%
6M
11.87%
1Y
53.13%
3Y*
46.68%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PKB vs. GDE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
PKB
Invesco Dynamic Building & Construction ETF
13.11%22.47%20.24%55.29%-12.22%
GDE
WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund
9.79%73.76%44.79%33.85%-18.67%

Correlation

The correlation between PKB and GDE is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 18, 2022

0.51

The correlation between PKB and GDE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.45 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PKB vs. GDE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PKB
PKB Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
PKB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PKB Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
PKB Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
PKB Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
PKB Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

GDE
GDE Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
GDE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GDE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
GDE Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
GDE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
GDE Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PKB vs. GDE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dynamic Building & Construction ETF (PKB) and WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund (GDE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PKBGDEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.34

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.23

2.36

-0.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.21

7.34

-0.13

PKB vs. GDE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PKB Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is comparable to the GDE Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PKB and GDE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PKBGDEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.49

1.88

-0.39

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

1.15

-0.78

Drawdowns

PKB vs. GDE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PKB drawdown since its inception was -65.21%, which is greater than GDE's maximum drawdown of -32.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PKB and GDE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PKBGDEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.21%

-32.01%

-33.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.41%

-22.66%

+7.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.75%

-22.66%

-7.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-52.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.33%

-11.17%

+5.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.77%

-7.88%

-7.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.75%

7.26%

-2.51%

Volatility

PKB vs. GDE - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Dynamic Building & Construction ETF (PKB) has a higher volatility of 7.61% compared to WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund (GDE) at 6.65%. This indicates that PKB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GDE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PKBGDEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.61%

6.65%

+0.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.84%

24.24%

-6.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.04%

28.39%

-5.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.69%

26.12%

-0.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.24%

26.12%

+1.12%

PKB vs. GDE - Expense Ratio Comparison

PKB has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than GDE's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

PKB vs. GDE - Dividend Comparison

PKB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%, less than GDE's 3.94% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GDE
WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund
3.94%4.32%7.14%2.22%0.81%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PKB
Invesco Dynamic Building & Construction ETF
0.14%0.14%0.23%0.33%0.43%0.25%0.30%0.37%0.54%0.17%0.31%0.11%

Frequently Asked Questions


PKB and GDE have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PKB has higher volatility (7.61%) compared to GDE (6.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PKB dropped -65.21% vs GDE's -32.01%.

On 3-year performance, GDE leads with 46.68% vs 29.75% for PKB. On fees, GDE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, GDE has been the lower-risk option at 6.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, GDE has performed better with a 46.68% return vs 29.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GDE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PKB.

GDE has the higher dividend yield at 3.94%, compared with 0.14% for PKB.

PKB is categorized as Building & Construction, while GDE is Gold. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PKB and 0.20% for GDE.

GDE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PKB and GDE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer