PJUL vs. XDQQ
PJUL (Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - July) and XDQQ (Innovator Growth Accelerated ETF - Quarterly) are both exchange-traded funds - PJUL is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index July, while XDQQ is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Innovator. PJUL is passively managed, while XDQQ is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, PJUL returned 10.49%/yr vs 8.32%/yr for XDQQ. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.79% expense ratio.
Performance
PJUL vs. XDQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PJUL achieves a 4.74% return, which is significantly higher than XDQQ's 2.58% return.
PJUL
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 1.44%
- YTD
- 4.74%
- 6M
- 5.40%
- 1Y
- 15.32%
- 3Y*
- 13.95%
- 5Y*
- 10.49%
- 10Y*
- —
XDQQ
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 1.36%
- YTD
- 2.58%
- 6M
- 2.48%
- 1Y
- 17.06%
- 3Y*
- 17.94%
- 5Y*
- 8.32%
- 10Y*
- —
PJUL vs. XDQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PJUL Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - July | 4.74% | 12.78% | 13.76% | 19.87% | -2.08% | 4.97% |
XDQQ Innovator Growth Accelerated ETF - Quarterly | 2.58% | 13.75% | 31.47% | 30.15% | -33.74% | 18.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between PJUL and XDQQ is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2021 | 0.84 |
The correlation between PJUL and XDQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.
PJUL vs. XDQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PJUL
XDQQ
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
PJUL
XDQQ
Financial Services
PJUL
XDQQ
Communication Services
PJUL
XDQQ
Consumer Cyclical
PJUL
XDQQ
Healthcare
PJUL
XDQQ
Industrials
PJUL
XDQQ
Consumer Defensive
PJUL
XDQQ
Energy
PJUL
XDQQ
Utilities
PJUL
XDQQ
Real Estate
PJUL
XDQQ
Basic Materials
PJUL
XDQQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PJUL vs. XDQQ — Risk / Return Rank
PJUL
XDQQ
PJUL vs. XDQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - July (PJUL) and Innovator Growth Accelerated ETF - Quarterly (XDQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PJUL | XDQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.73 | 1.24 | +1.49 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.12 | 1.70 | +2.42 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.59 | 1.26 | +0.33 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.22 | 1.45 | +2.78 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 23.24 | 6.57 | +16.66 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PJUL | XDQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.73 | 1.24 | +1.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.23 | 0.42 | +0.80 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.90 | 0.46 | +0.43 |
Drawdowns
PJUL vs. XDQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PJUL drawdown since its inception was -18.17%, smaller than the maximum XDQQ drawdown of -35.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PJUL and XDQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PJUL | XDQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.17% | -35.63% | +17.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.64% | -11.84% | +8.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.69% | -23.17% | +12.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -10.69% | -35.63% | +24.94% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.05% | +0.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.47% | -10.84% | +9.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.66% | 2.60% | -1.94% |
Volatility
PJUL vs. XDQQ - Volatility Comparison
Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - July (PJUL) and Innovator Growth Accelerated ETF - Quarterly (XDQQ) have volatilities of 0.42% and 0.40%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PJUL | XDQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.42% | 0.40% | +0.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.89% | 11.13% | -7.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.66% | 13.81% | -8.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.60% | 19.81% | -11.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.03% | 19.66% | -9.63% |
PJUL vs. XDQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both PJUL and XDQQ have an expense ratio of 0.79%.
Dividends
PJUL vs. XDQQ - Dividend Comparison
Neither PJUL nor XDQQ has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PJUL Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - July | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.82% |
XDQQ Innovator Growth Accelerated ETF - Quarterly | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PJUL and XDQQ have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PJUL has higher volatility (0.42%) compared to XDQQ (0.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PJUL dropped -18.17% vs XDQQ's -35.63%.
On 5-year performance, PJUL leads with 10.49% vs 8.32% for XDQQ. Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, PJUL has performed better with a 10.49% return vs 8.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PJUL and XDQQ have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.
PJUL and XDQQ have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
PJUL is categorized as Defined Outcome, while XDQQ is Leveraged Equities.
PJUL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.73 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PJUL and XDQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer