PJUL vs. POCT
PJUL (Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - July) and POCT (Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October) are both Defined Outcome funds from Innovator - PJUL tracks the Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index July while POCT tracks the Cboe S&P 500 15% Buffer Protect October Series Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PJUL returned 10.49%/yr vs 9.82%/yr for POCT. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.79% expense ratio.
Performance
PJUL vs. POCT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PJUL achieves a 4.74% return, which is significantly lower than POCT's 5.33% return.
PJUL
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 1.44%
- YTD
- 4.74%
- 6M
- 5.40%
- 1Y
- 15.32%
- 3Y*
- 13.95%
- 5Y*
- 10.49%
- 10Y*
- —
POCT
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 2.01%
- YTD
- 5.33%
- 6M
- 5.92%
- 1Y
- 14.36%
- 3Y*
- 12.17%
- 5Y*
- 9.82%
- 10Y*
- —
PJUL vs. POCT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PJUL Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - July | 4.74% | 12.78% | 13.76% | 19.87% | -2.08% | 7.20% | 7.51% | 12.47% | -6.63% |
POCT Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October | 5.33% | 11.00% | 9.54% | 20.12% | -1.26% | 9.46% | 10.40% | 12.80% | -7.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between PJUL and POCT is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2018 | 0.85 |
The correlation between PJUL and POCT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
PJUL vs. POCT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PJUL
POCT
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
PJUL
POCT
Financial Services
PJUL
POCT
Communication Services
PJUL
POCT
Consumer Cyclical
PJUL
POCT
Healthcare
PJUL
POCT
Industrials
PJUL
POCT
Consumer Defensive
PJUL
POCT
Energy
PJUL
POCT
Utilities
PJUL
POCT
Real Estate
PJUL
POCT
Basic Materials
PJUL
POCT
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PJUL vs. POCT — Risk / Return Rank
PJUL
POCT
PJUL vs. POCT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - July (PJUL) and Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October (POCT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PJUL | POCT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.73 | 2.35 | +0.39 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.12 | 3.38 | +0.74 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.59 | 1.47 | +0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.22 | 3.28 | +0.94 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 23.24 | 16.84 | +6.40 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PJUL | POCT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.73 | 2.35 | +0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.23 | 1.24 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.90 | 0.87 | +0.02 |
Drawdowns
PJUL vs. POCT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PJUL drawdown since its inception was -18.17%, roughly equal to the maximum POCT drawdown of -18.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PJUL and POCT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PJUL | POCT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.17% | -18.80% | +0.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.64% | -4.40% | +0.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.69% | -10.22% | -0.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -10.69% | -10.22% | -0.47% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.20% | +0.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.47% | -1.50% | +0.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.66% | 0.86% | -0.20% |
Volatility
PJUL vs. POCT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - July (PJUL) is 0.42%, while Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October (POCT) has a volatility of 0.94%. This indicates that PJUL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than POCT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PJUL | POCT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.42% | 0.94% | -0.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.89% | 4.77% | -0.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.66% | 6.17% | -0.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.60% | 7.94% | +0.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.03% | 10.22% | -0.19% |
PJUL vs. POCT - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both PJUL and POCT have an expense ratio of 0.79%.
Dividends
PJUL vs. POCT - Dividend Comparison
Neither PJUL nor POCT has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PJUL Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - July | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.82% |
POCT Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.21% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, PJUL and POCT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
POCT has higher volatility (0.94%) compared to PJUL (0.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PJUL dropped -18.17% vs POCT's -18.80%.
On 5-year performance, PJUL leads with 10.49% vs 9.82% for POCT. Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. On volatility, PJUL has been the lower-risk option at 0.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, PJUL has performed better with a 10.49% return vs 9.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PJUL and POCT have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.
PJUL and POCT have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
PJUL tracks Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index July, while POCT tracks Cboe S&P 500 15% Buffer Protect October Series Index.
PJUL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.73 vs 2.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PJUL and POCT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer