PJUL vs. OILK
PJUL (Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - July) and OILK (ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PJUL is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index July, while OILK is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PJUL returned 10.49%/yr vs 17.73%/yr for OILK. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PJUL charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for OILK.
Performance
PJUL vs. OILK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PJUL achieves a 4.74% return, which is significantly lower than OILK's 64.22% return.
PJUL
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 1.44%
- YTD
- 4.74%
- 6M
- 5.40%
- 1Y
- 15.32%
- 3Y*
- 13.95%
- 5Y*
- 10.49%
- 10Y*
- —
OILK
- 1D
- 1.40%
- 1M
- -1.65%
- YTD
- 64.22%
- 6M
- 60.70%
- 1Y
- 58.99%
- 3Y*
- 19.03%
- 5Y*
- 17.73%
- 10Y*
- —
PJUL vs. OILK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PJUL Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - July | 4.74% | 12.78% | 13.76% | 19.87% | -2.08% | 7.20% | 7.51% | 12.47% | -4.45% |
OILK ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF | 64.22% | -11.86% | 8.18% | -0.97% | 27.57% | 63.71% | -61.09% | 30.48% | -30.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between PJUL and OILK is -0.27, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 9, 2018 | 0.17 |
The correlation between PJUL and OILK shifts across timeframes, from -0.27 (1 year) to 0.17 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
PJUL vs. OILK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PJUL
OILK
Technology
-
Financial Services
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Technology
PJUL
OILK
-
Financial Services
PJUL
OILK
-
Communication Services
PJUL
OILK
-
Consumer Cyclical
PJUL
OILK
Healthcare
PJUL
OILK
-
Industrials
PJUL
OILK
-
Consumer Defensive
PJUL
OILK
-
Energy
PJUL
OILK
-
Utilities
PJUL
OILK
-
Real Estate
PJUL
OILK
-
Basic Materials
PJUL
OILK
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PJUL vs. OILK — Risk / Return Rank
PJUL
OILK
PJUL vs. OILK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - July (PJUL) and ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PJUL | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.73 | 2.06 | +0.67 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.12 | 2.59 | +1.53 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.59 | 1.34 | +0.25 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.22 | 3.42 | +0.81 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 23.24 | 6.91 | +16.33 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PJUL | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.73 | 2.06 | +0.67 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.23 | 0.59 | +0.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.90 | 0.12 | +0.78 |
Drawdowns
PJUL vs. OILK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PJUL drawdown since its inception was -18.17%, smaller than the maximum OILK drawdown of -83.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PJUL and OILK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PJUL | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.17% | -83.76% | +65.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.64% | -17.35% | +13.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.69% | -23.42% | +12.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -10.69% | -34.69% | +24.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -3.66% | +3.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.47% | -32.61% | +31.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.66% | 8.56% | -7.90% |
Volatility
PJUL vs. OILK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - July (PJUL) is 0.42%, while ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK) has a volatility of 10.44%. This indicates that PJUL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OILK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PJUL | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.42% | 10.44% | -10.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.89% | 23.26% | -19.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.66% | 28.75% | -23.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.60% | 30.12% | -21.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.03% | 35.97% | -25.94% |
PJUL vs. OILK - Expense Ratio Comparison
PJUL has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than OILK's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
PJUL vs. OILK - Dividend Comparison
PJUL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while OILK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.18%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OILK ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF | 8.18% | 4.79% | 3.11% | 5.80% | 17.32% | 68.82% | 0.13% | 0.94% | 0.58% | 6.17% |
PJUL Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - July | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.82% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PJUL and OILK have a correlation of -0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
OILK has higher volatility (10.44%) compared to PJUL (0.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PJUL dropped -18.17% vs OILK's -83.76%.
On 5-year performance, OILK leads with 17.73% vs 10.49% for PJUL. On fees, OILK is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, PJUL has been the lower-risk option at 0.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, OILK has performed better with a 17.73% return vs 10.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
OILK is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for PJUL.
OILK has the higher dividend yield at 8.18%, compared with 0.00% for PJUL.
PJUL is categorized as Defined Outcome, while OILK is Oil & Gas. PJUL tracks Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index July, while OILK tracks Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for PJUL and 0.68% for OILK.
PJUL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.73 vs 2.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PJUL and OILK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer