PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PJUL vs. DJUL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PJUL vs. DJUL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - July (PJUL) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - July (DJUL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with PJUL having a 4.74% return and DJUL slightly higher at 4.86%.


PJUL

1D
0.10%
1M
1.44%
YTD
4.74%
6M
5.40%
1Y
15.32%
3Y*
13.95%
5Y*
10.49%
10Y*

DJUL

1D
-0.02%
1M
1.35%
YTD
4.86%
6M
5.63%
1Y
16.81%
3Y*
14.03%
5Y*
8.95%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PJUL vs. DJUL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
PJUL
Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - July
4.74%12.78%13.76%19.87%-2.08%7.20%5.08%
DJUL
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - July
4.86%13.31%15.02%18.08%-8.28%6.18%4.51%

Correlation

The correlation between PJUL and DJUL is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 21, 2020

0.91

The correlation between PJUL and DJUL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

PJUL vs. DJUL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PJUL
DJUL

Technology

36.2%
36.2%

Financial Services

11.9%
11.9%

Communication Services

10.9%
10.9%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
10.1%

Healthcare

8.4%
8.4%

Industrials

8.1%
8.1%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
4.9%

Energy

3.5%
3.5%

Utilities

2.3%
2.3%

Real Estate

1.9%
1.9%

Basic Materials

1.8%
1.8%

Technology

PJUL
36.2%
DJUL
36.2%

Financial Services

PJUL
11.9%
DJUL
11.9%

Communication Services

PJUL
10.9%
DJUL
10.9%

Consumer Cyclical

PJUL
10.1%
DJUL
10.1%

Healthcare

PJUL
8.4%
DJUL
8.4%

Industrials

PJUL
8.1%
DJUL
8.1%

Consumer Defensive

PJUL
4.9%
DJUL
4.9%

Energy

PJUL
3.5%
DJUL
3.5%

Utilities

PJUL
2.3%
DJUL
2.3%

Real Estate

PJUL
1.9%
DJUL
1.9%

Basic Materials

PJUL
1.8%
DJUL
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PJUL vs. DJUL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PJUL
PJUL Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
PJUL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PJUL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
PJUL Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
PJUL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
PJUL Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

DJUL
DJUL Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
DJUL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DJUL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
DJUL Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
DJUL Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
DJUL Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PJUL vs. DJUL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - July (PJUL) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - July (DJUL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PJULDJULDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.73

2.99

-0.26

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.12

4.53

-0.40

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.59

1.64

-0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.22

4.01

+0.22

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

23.24

21.68

+1.56

PJUL vs. DJUL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PJUL Sharpe Ratio is 2.73, which is comparable to the DJUL Sharpe Ratio of 2.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PJUL and DJUL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PJULDJULDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.73

2.99

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.23

1.07

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.90

1.11

-0.22

Drawdowns

PJUL vs. DJUL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PJUL drawdown since its inception was -18.17%, which is greater than DJUL's maximum drawdown of -12.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PJUL and DJUL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PJULDJULDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.17%

-12.54%

-5.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.64%

-4.25%

+0.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.69%

-11.29%

+0.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.69%

-12.54%

+1.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.02%

+0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.47%

-2.00%

+0.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.66%

0.79%

-0.13%

Volatility

PJUL vs. DJUL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - July (PJUL) is 0.42%, while FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - July (DJUL) has a volatility of 0.64%. This indicates that PJUL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DJUL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PJULDJULDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.42%

0.64%

-0.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.89%

4.16%

-0.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.66%

5.65%

+0.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.60%

8.39%

+0.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.03%

7.94%

+2.09%

PJUL vs. DJUL - Expense Ratio Comparison

PJUL has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than DJUL's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

PJUL vs. DJUL - Dividend Comparison

Neither PJUL nor DJUL has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
DJUL
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - July
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PJUL
Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - July
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.82%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, PJUL and DJUL move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

DJUL has higher volatility (0.64%) compared to PJUL (0.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PJUL dropped -18.17% vs DJUL's -12.54%.

On 5-year performance, PJUL leads with 10.49% vs 8.95% for DJUL. On fees, PJUL is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, PJUL has been the lower-risk option at 0.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, PJUL has performed better with a 10.49% return vs 8.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PJUL is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for DJUL.

PJUL and DJUL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

PJUL is categorized as Defined Outcome, while DJUL is Options Trading. PJUL tracks Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index July, while DJUL tracks Cboe S&P 500 30% (-5% to -35%) Buffer Protect July Series Index. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and FT Vest. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for PJUL and 0.85% for DJUL.

DJUL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.99 vs 2.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PJUL and DJUL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer