PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PJUL vs. DJUL
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

PJUL vs. DJUL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - July (PJUL) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - July (DJUL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

PJUL vs. DJUL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
PJUL
Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - July
-0.60%12.78%13.76%19.87%-2.08%7.20%5.08%
DJUL
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - July
-1.22%13.31%15.02%18.08%-8.28%6.18%4.51%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PJUL achieves a -0.60% return, which is significantly higher than DJUL's -1.22% return.


PJUL

1D
0.40%
1M
-1.41%
YTD
-0.60%
6M
1.12%
1Y
14.39%
3Y*
13.41%
5Y*
9.46%
10Y*

DJUL

1D
0.53%
1M
-1.96%
YTD
-1.22%
6M
0.39%
1Y
14.66%
3Y*
13.26%
5Y*
7.79%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


PJUL vs. DJUL - Expense Ratio Comparison

PJUL has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than DJUL's 0.85% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

PJUL vs. DJUL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PJUL
PJUL Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
PJUL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PJUL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
PJUL Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
PJUL Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
PJUL Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

DJUL
DJUL Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
DJUL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DJUL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
DJUL Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
DJUL Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
DJUL Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PJUL vs. DJUL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - July (PJUL) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - July (DJUL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PJULDJULDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.43

1.47

-0.04

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.17

2.18

-0.01

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.36

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.12

2.09

+0.03

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.94

10.86

+1.08

PJUL vs. DJUL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PJUL Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is comparable to the DJUL Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PJUL and DJUL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PJULDJULDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.43

1.47

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.11

0.94

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.83

1.00

-0.16

Correlation

The correlation between PJUL and DJUL is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

PJUL vs. DJUL - Dividend Comparison

Neither PJUL nor DJUL has paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019
PJUL
Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - July
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.82%
DJUL
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - July
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

PJUL vs. DJUL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PJUL drawdown since its inception was -18.17%, which is greater than DJUL's maximum drawdown of -12.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PJUL and DJUL.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


PJULDJULDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.17%

-12.54%

-5.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.99%

-7.11%

+0.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.69%

-12.54%

+1.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.68%

-2.27%

+0.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.50%

-2.05%

+0.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.24%

1.37%

-0.13%

Volatility

PJUL vs. DJUL - Volatility Comparison

Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - July (PJUL) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - July (DJUL) have volatilities of 2.93% and 2.91%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


PJULDJULDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.93%

2.91%

+0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.17%

4.34%

-0.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.09%

10.00%

+0.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.58%

8.35%

+0.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.12%

8.02%

+2.10%