PJP vs. SOXQ
PJP (Invesco Dynamic Pharmaceuticals ETF) and SOXQ (Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PJP is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the Dynamic Pharmaceuticals Intellidex Index, while SOXQ is a Semiconductors fund tracking the PHLX Semiconductor Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, PJP returned 13.31%/yr vs 59.40%/yr for SOXQ. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PJP charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for SOXQ.
Performance
PJP vs. SOXQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PJP achieves a 2.90% return, which is significantly lower than SOXQ's 96.72% return.
PJP
- 1D
- 1.20%
- 1M
- 1.29%
- YTD
- 2.90%
- 6M
- 2.29%
- 1Y
- 34.73%
- 3Y*
- 13.31%
- 5Y*
- 7.62%
- 10Y*
- 6.15%
SOXQ
- 1D
- 1.42%
- 1M
- 32.12%
- YTD
- 96.72%
- 6M
- 91.61%
- 1Y
- 181.76%
- 3Y*
- 59.40%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PJP vs. SOXQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PJP Invesco Dynamic Pharmaceuticals ETF | 2.90% | 27.98% | 9.63% | -2.18% | -2.16% | 0.12% |
SOXQ Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF | 96.72% | 43.11% | 20.16% | 66.74% | -35.59% | 24.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between PJP and SOXQ is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2021 | 0.36 |
The correlation between PJP and SOXQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (1 year) to 0.36 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
PJP vs. SOXQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PJP
SOXQ
Healthcare
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Healthcare
PJP
SOXQ
-
Basic Materials
PJP
-
SOXQ
-
Communication Services
PJP
-
SOXQ
-
Consumer Cyclical
PJP
-
SOXQ
-
Consumer Defensive
PJP
-
SOXQ
-
Energy
PJP
-
SOXQ
-
Financial Services
PJP
-
SOXQ
Industrials
PJP
-
SOXQ
-
Real Estate
PJP
-
SOXQ
-
Technology
PJP
-
SOXQ
Utilities
PJP
-
SOXQ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PJP vs. SOXQ — Risk / Return Rank
PJP
SOXQ
PJP vs. SOXQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dynamic Pharmaceuticals ETF (PJP) and Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PJP | SOXQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.72 | -0.37 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.70 | 11.73 | -8.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.55 | 45.01 | -33.47 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PJP | SOXQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.13 | 5.43 | -3.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.34 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.59 | 0.98 | -0.39 |
Drawdowns
PJP vs. SOXQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PJP drawdown since its inception was -37.06%, smaller than the maximum SOXQ drawdown of -46.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PJP and SOXQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PJP | SOXQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.06% | -46.01% | +8.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.44% | -15.59% | +6.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.27% | -39.36% | +23.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.51% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.95% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.94% | 0.00% | -2.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.85% | -12.96% | +4.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.02% | 4.06% | -1.04% |
Volatility
PJP vs. SOXQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Dynamic Pharmaceuticals ETF (PJP) is 5.33%, while Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXQ) has a volatility of 13.44%. This indicates that PJP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SOXQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PJP | SOXQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.33% | 13.44% | -8.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.02% | 26.70% | -14.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.38% | 33.78% | -17.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.17% | 36.38% | -20.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.39% | 36.38% | -17.99% |
PJP vs. SOXQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
PJP has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than SOXQ's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
PJP vs. SOXQ - Dividend Comparison
PJP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%, more than SOXQ's 0.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PJP Invesco Dynamic Pharmaceuticals ETF | 0.99% | 0.98% | 0.97% | 1.01% | 0.95% | 0.81% | 0.75% | 0.77% | 1.12% | 0.65% | 0.91% | 5.49% |
SOXQ Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF | 0.26% | 0.50% | 0.68% | 0.87% | 1.36% | 0.72% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PJP and SOXQ have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SOXQ has higher volatility (13.44%) compared to PJP (5.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PJP dropped -37.06% vs SOXQ's -46.01%.
On 3-year performance, SOXQ leads with 59.40% vs 13.31% for PJP. On fees, SOXQ is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, PJP has been the lower-risk option at 5.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SOXQ has performed better with a 59.40% return vs 13.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SOXQ is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for PJP.
PJP has the higher dividend yield at 0.99%, compared with 0.26% for SOXQ.
PJP is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while SOXQ is Semiconductors. PJP tracks Dynamic Pharmaceuticals Intellidex Index, while SOXQ tracks PHLX Semiconductor Sector Index. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for PJP and 0.19% for SOXQ.
SOXQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.43 vs 2.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PJP and SOXQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer