PJP vs. IBBQ
PJP (Invesco Dynamic Pharmaceuticals ETF) and IBBQ (Invesco Nasdaq Biotechnology ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds from Invesco - PJP tracks the Dynamic Pharmaceuticals Intellidex Index while IBBQ tracks the NASDAQ / Biotechnology. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, PJP returned 13.31%/yr vs 12.60%/yr for IBBQ. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PJP charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.00%/yr for IBBQ.
Performance
PJP vs. IBBQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PJP achieves a 2.90% return, which is significantly higher than IBBQ's 1.91% return.
PJP
- 1D
- 1.20%
- 1M
- 1.29%
- YTD
- 2.90%
- 6M
- 2.29%
- 1Y
- 34.73%
- 3Y*
- 13.31%
- 5Y*
- 7.62%
- 10Y*
- 6.15%
IBBQ
- 1D
- 1.77%
- 1M
- -1.63%
- YTD
- 1.91%
- 6M
- 0.94%
- 1Y
- 39.72%
- 3Y*
- 12.60%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PJP vs. IBBQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PJP Invesco Dynamic Pharmaceuticals ETF | 2.90% | 27.98% | 9.63% | -2.18% | -2.16% | 0.12% |
IBBQ Invesco Nasdaq Biotechnology ETF | 1.91% | 33.32% | -0.63% | 4.73% | -10.41% | -6.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between PJP and IBBQ is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2021 | 0.80 |
The correlation between PJP and IBBQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.
PJP vs. IBBQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PJP
IBBQ
Healthcare
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Healthcare
PJP
IBBQ
Basic Materials
PJP
-
IBBQ
-
Communication Services
PJP
-
IBBQ
-
Consumer Cyclical
PJP
-
IBBQ
-
Consumer Defensive
PJP
-
IBBQ
-
Energy
PJP
-
IBBQ
-
Financial Services
PJP
-
IBBQ
Industrials
PJP
-
IBBQ
-
Real Estate
PJP
-
IBBQ
-
Technology
PJP
-
IBBQ
-
Utilities
PJP
-
IBBQ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PJP vs. IBBQ — Risk / Return Rank
PJP
IBBQ
PJP vs. IBBQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dynamic Pharmaceuticals ETF (PJP) and Invesco Nasdaq Biotechnology ETF (IBBQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PJP | IBBQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.34 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.70 | 4.79 | -1.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.55 | 15.68 | -4.14 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PJP | IBBQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.13 | 2.03 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.34 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.59 | 0.16 | +0.43 |
Drawdowns
PJP vs. IBBQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PJP drawdown since its inception was -37.06%, roughly equal to the maximum IBBQ drawdown of -37.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PJP and IBBQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PJP | IBBQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.06% | -37.94% | +0.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.44% | -8.34% | -1.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.27% | -23.66% | +7.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.51% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.95% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.94% | -5.17% | +2.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.85% | -16.82% | +7.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.02% | 2.54% | +0.48% |
Volatility
PJP vs. IBBQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Dynamic Pharmaceuticals ETF (PJP) is 5.33%, while Invesco Nasdaq Biotechnology ETF (IBBQ) has a volatility of 6.84%. This indicates that PJP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBBQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PJP | IBBQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.33% | 6.84% | -1.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.02% | 15.14% | -3.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.38% | 19.63% | -3.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.17% | 21.86% | -5.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.39% | 21.86% | -3.47% |
PJP vs. IBBQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
PJP has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than IBBQ's 0.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
PJP vs. IBBQ - Dividend Comparison
PJP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%, more than IBBQ's 0.87% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBBQ Invesco Nasdaq Biotechnology ETF | 0.87% | 0.90% | 1.14% | 0.81% | 0.76% | 0.63% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PJP Invesco Dynamic Pharmaceuticals ETF | 0.99% | 0.98% | 0.97% | 1.01% | 0.95% | 0.81% | 0.75% | 0.77% | 1.12% | 0.65% | 0.91% | 5.49% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PJP and IBBQ have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IBBQ has higher volatility (6.84%) compared to PJP (5.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PJP dropped -37.06% vs IBBQ's -37.94%.
On 3-year performance, PJP leads with 13.31% vs 12.60% for IBBQ. On fees, IBBQ is cheaper at 0.00% per year. On volatility, PJP has been the lower-risk option at 5.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, PJP has performed better with a 13.31% return vs 12.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IBBQ is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for PJP.
PJP has the higher dividend yield at 0.99%, compared with 0.87% for IBBQ.
PJP tracks Dynamic Pharmaceuticals Intellidex Index, while IBBQ tracks NASDAQ / Biotechnology. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for PJP and 0.00% for IBBQ.
PJP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 2.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PJP and IBBQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer