PJP vs. BTEC
PJP (Invesco Dynamic Pharmaceuticals ETF) and BTEC (Principal Healthcare Innovators Index ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds - PJP tracks the Dynamic Pharmaceuticals Intellidex Index while BTEC tracks the NASDAQ U.S. Health Care Innovators Index. Both are passively managed. PJP charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.42%/yr for BTEC.
Performance
PJP vs. BTEC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
PJP
- 1D
- 1.20%
- 1M
- 1.29%
- YTD
- 2.90%
- 6M
- 2.29%
- 1Y
- 34.73%
- 3Y*
- 13.31%
- 5Y*
- 7.62%
- 10Y*
- 6.15%
BTEC
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PJP vs. BTEC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
PJP Invesco Dynamic Pharmaceuticals ETF | -2.67% |
BTEC Principal Healthcare Innovators Index ETF | 0.00% |
PJP vs. BTEC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PJP
BTEC
Healthcare
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Healthcare
PJP
BTEC
Basic Materials
PJP
-
BTEC
-
Communication Services
PJP
-
BTEC
-
Consumer Cyclical
PJP
-
BTEC
-
Consumer Defensive
PJP
-
BTEC
-
Energy
PJP
-
BTEC
-
Financial Services
PJP
-
BTEC
-
Industrials
PJP
-
BTEC
Real Estate
PJP
-
BTEC
-
Technology
PJP
-
BTEC
-
Utilities
PJP
-
BTEC
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PJP vs. BTEC — Risk / Return Rank
PJP
BTEC
PJP vs. BTEC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dynamic Pharmaceuticals ETF (PJP) and Principal Healthcare Innovators Index ETF (BTEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PJP | BTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.70 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.55 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PJP | BTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.13 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.34 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.59 | — | — |
Drawdowns
PJP vs. BTEC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PJP drawdown since its inception was -37.06%, which is greater than BTEC's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PJP and BTEC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PJP | BTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.06% | 0.00% | -37.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.44% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.27% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.51% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.95% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.94% | 0.00% | -2.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.85% | 0.00% | -8.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.02% | — | — |
Volatility
PJP vs. BTEC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PJP | BTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.33% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.02% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.38% | 0.00% | +16.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.17% | 0.00% | +16.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.39% | 0.00% | +18.39% |
PJP vs. BTEC - Expense Ratio Comparison
PJP has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than BTEC's 0.42% expense ratio.
Dividends
PJP vs. BTEC - Dividend Comparison
PJP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%, while BTEC has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BTEC Principal Healthcare Innovators Index ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PJP Invesco Dynamic Pharmaceuticals ETF | 0.99% | 0.98% | 0.97% | 1.01% | 0.95% | 0.81% | 0.75% | 0.77% | 1.12% | 0.65% | 0.91% | 5.49% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, BTEC is cheaper at 0.42% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BTEC is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for PJP.
PJP has the higher dividend yield at 0.99%, compared with 0.00% for BTEC.
PJP tracks Dynamic Pharmaceuticals Intellidex Index, while BTEC tracks NASDAQ U.S. Health Care Innovators Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Principal. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for PJP and 0.42% for BTEC.
Find the right allocation for PJP and BTEC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer