PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PJIZX vs. FAOCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PJIZX vs. FAOCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Quant Solutions International Equity Fund (PJIZX) and Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class C (FAOCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

Over the past 10 years, PJIZX has outperformed FAOCX with an annualized return of 10.95%, while FAOCX has yielded a comparatively lower 6.29% annualized return.


PJIZX

1D
0.71%
1M
5.82%
YTD
17.64%
6M
21.12%
1Y
40.41%
3Y*
26.99%
5Y*
12.16%
10Y*
10.95%

FAOCX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
0.00%
6M
0.00%
1Y
-2.15%
3Y*
7.84%
5Y*
2.69%
10Y*
6.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PJIZX vs. FAOCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PJIZX
PGIM Quant Solutions International Equity Fund
17.64%41.41%10.78%19.44%-17.70%10.15%6.90%20.36%-17.19%28.46%
FAOCX
Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class C
0.00%14.19%3.86%19.03%-25.22%17.97%13.77%26.37%-15.77%28.58%

Correlation

The correlation between PJIZX and FAOCX is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 1, 2000

0.89

Over the past year, the correlation between PJIZX and FAOCX has dropped to 0.54 - well below their long-term average of 0.89, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PJIZX vs. FAOCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PJIZX
PJIZX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
PJIZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PJIZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
PJIZX Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
PJIZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
PJIZX Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

FAOCX
FAOCX Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
FAOCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FAOCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
FAOCX Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
FAOCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
FAOCX Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PJIZX vs. FAOCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Quant Solutions International Equity Fund (PJIZX) and Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class C (FAOCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PJIZXFAOCXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.59

-0.34

+2.92

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.45

-0.40

+3.85

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

0.94

+0.54

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.25

-0.42

+3.66

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.20

-0.72

+13.91

PJIZX vs. FAOCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PJIZX Sharpe Ratio is 2.59, which is higher than the FAOCX Sharpe Ratio of -0.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PJIZX and FAOCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PJIZXFAOCXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.59

-0.34

+2.92

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

0.17

+0.62

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

0.38

+0.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.17

0.25

-0.09

Drawdowns

PJIZX vs. FAOCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PJIZX drawdown since its inception was -67.75%, which is greater than FAOCX's maximum drawdown of -60.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PJIZX and FAOCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PJIZXFAOCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.75%

-60.45%

-7.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.32%

-7.33%

-4.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.53%

-14.05%

+0.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.69%

-36.96%

+6.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.42%

-36.96%

-2.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-5.90%

+5.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.74%

-15.62%

-8.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.02%

4.01%

-0.99%

Volatility

PJIZX vs. FAOCX - Volatility Comparison

PGIM Quant Solutions International Equity Fund (PJIZX) has a higher volatility of 5.63% compared to Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class C (FAOCX) at 0.00%. This indicates that PJIZX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FAOCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PJIZXFAOCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.63%

0.00%

+5.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.23%

4.07%

+9.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.49%

9.17%

+6.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.48%

16.72%

-1.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.89%

16.69%

-0.80%

PJIZX vs. FAOCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PJIZX has a 1.04% expense ratio, which is lower than FAOCX's 2.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

PJIZX vs. FAOCX - Dividend Comparison

PJIZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.54%, more than FAOCX's 8.26% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FAOCX
Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class C
8.26%8.26%0.40%0.00%0.00%2.22%0.00%0.51%3.72%3.07%0.12%0.00%
PJIZX
PGIM Quant Solutions International Equity Fund
8.54%10.05%4.25%4.25%4.11%11.66%1.74%2.73%3.46%1.98%2.28%1.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


PJIZX and FAOCX have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PJIZX has higher volatility (5.63%) compared to FAOCX (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PJIZX dropped -67.75% vs FAOCX's -60.45%.

PJIZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.59 vs -0.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PJIZX and FAOCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer