PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PJFM vs. EPU
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

PJFM vs. EPU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Jennison Focused Mid-Cap ETF (PJFM) and iShares MSCI Peru ETF (EPU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

PJFM vs. EPU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
PJFM
PGIM Jennison Focused Mid-Cap ETF
0.50%7.50%15.64%-0.08%
EPU
iShares MSCI Peru ETF
14.25%86.87%21.73%1.24%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PJFM achieves a 0.50% return, which is significantly lower than EPU's 14.25% return.


PJFM

1D
1.17%
1M
-5.57%
YTD
0.50%
6M
3.87%
1Y
13.59%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

EPU

1D
2.42%
1M
-11.48%
YTD
14.25%
6M
35.96%
1Y
89.75%
3Y*
45.24%
5Y*
24.03%
10Y*
15.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


PJFM vs. EPU - Expense Ratio Comparison

PJFM has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than EPU's 0.59% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

PJFM vs. EPU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PJFM
PJFM Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
PJFM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PJFM Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
PJFM Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
PJFM Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
PJFM Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

EPU
EPU Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
EPU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EPU Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
EPU Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
EPU Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
EPU Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PJFM vs. EPU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Jennison Focused Mid-Cap ETF (PJFM) and iShares MSCI Peru ETF (EPU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PJFMEPUDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.68

3.07

-2.39

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.06

3.41

-2.34

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.49

-0.34

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.01

4.44

-3.43

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.07

18.15

-14.08

PJFM vs. EPU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PJFM Sharpe Ratio is 0.68, which is lower than the EPU Sharpe Ratio of 3.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PJFM and EPU, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PJFMEPUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

3.07

-2.39

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.45

+0.13

Correlation

The correlation between PJFM and EPU is 0.47, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

PJFM vs. EPU - Dividend Comparison

PJFM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%, less than EPU's 1.43% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PJFM
PGIM Jennison Focused Mid-Cap ETF
0.62%0.62%0.83%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
EPU
iShares MSCI Peru ETF
1.43%1.63%5.78%4.17%5.56%3.13%1.91%2.67%1.53%3.30%0.85%1.90%

Drawdowns

PJFM vs. EPU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PJFM drawdown since its inception was -22.84%, smaller than the maximum EPU drawdown of -60.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PJFM and EPU.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


PJFMEPUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.84%

-60.62%

+37.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.33%

-20.85%

+6.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.65%

-11.91%

+5.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.87%

-18.90%

+15.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.56%

5.11%

-1.55%

Volatility

PJFM vs. EPU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PGIM Jennison Focused Mid-Cap ETF (PJFM) is 7.05%, while iShares MSCI Peru ETF (EPU) has a volatility of 13.10%. This indicates that PJFM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EPU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


PJFMEPUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.05%

13.10%

-6.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.72%

24.12%

-12.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.07%

29.37%

-9.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.59%

25.09%

-7.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.59%

23.63%

-6.04%