PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PJFAX vs. ACIHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PJFAX vs. ACIHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Jennison Growth Fund (PJFAX) and American Century Growth Fund G Class (ACIHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PJFAX achieves a 7.82% return, which is significantly higher than ACIHX's 7.24% return.


PJFAX

1D
-1.29%
1M
6.04%
YTD
7.82%
6M
6.49%
1Y
19.18%
3Y*
28.71%
5Y*
14.67%
10Y*
20.13%

ACIHX

1D
-1.57%
1M
5.48%
YTD
7.24%
6M
6.26%
1Y
25.16%
3Y*
22.42%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PJFAX vs. ACIHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
PJFAX
PGIM Jennison Growth Fund
7.82%14.53%48.10%52.76%-8.46%
ACIHX
American Century Growth Fund G Class
7.24%16.26%27.35%44.64%-6.24%

Correlation

The correlation between PJFAX and ACIHX is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 17, 2022

0.97

The correlation between PJFAX and ACIHX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PJFAX vs. ACIHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PJFAX
PJFAX Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
PJFAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PJFAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
PJFAX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
PJFAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
PJFAX Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

ACIHX
ACIHX Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
ACIHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACIHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACIHX Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
ACIHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACIHX Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PJFAX vs. ACIHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Jennison Growth Fund (PJFAX) and American Century Growth Fund G Class (ACIHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PJFAXACIHXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.29

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.12

1.58

-0.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.56

5.29

-1.73

PJFAX vs. ACIHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PJFAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.22, which is comparable to the ACIHX Sharpe Ratio of 1.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PJFAX and ACIHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PJFAXACIHXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.22

1.64

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

1.00

-0.48

Drawdowns

PJFAX vs. ACIHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PJFAX drawdown since its inception was -64.07%, which is greater than ACIHX's maximum drawdown of -24.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PJFAX and ACIHX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PJFAXACIHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.07%

-24.00%

-40.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.76%

-16.40%

-1.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.05%

-24.00%

-0.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.92%

-2.07%

+0.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.35%

-4.89%

-15.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.55%

4.87%

+0.68%

Volatility

PJFAX vs. ACIHX - Volatility Comparison

PGIM Jennison Growth Fund (PJFAX) has a higher volatility of 4.17% compared to American Century Growth Fund G Class (ACIHX) at 3.93%. This indicates that PJFAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ACIHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PJFAXACIHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.17%

3.93%

+0.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.40%

12.02%

+0.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.31%

15.80%

+0.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.69%

21.06%

+3.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.01%

21.06%

+2.95%

PJFAX vs. ACIHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PJFAX has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than ACIHX's 0.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

PJFAX vs. ACIHX - Dividend Comparison

PJFAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.44%, less than ACIHX's 14.87% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ACIHX
American Century Growth Fund G Class
14.87%15.95%5.65%4.61%2.86%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PJFAX
PGIM Jennison Growth Fund
12.44%13.42%24.62%7.23%2.77%14.67%9.02%16.27%6.06%5.85%4.12%6.90%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, PJFAX and ACIHX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

PJFAX has higher volatility (4.17%) compared to ACIHX (3.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PJFAX dropped -64.07% vs ACIHX's -24.00%.

ACIHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.64 vs 1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PJFAX and ACIHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer