PJBF vs. PID

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

PJBF (PGIM Jennison Better Future ETF) and PID (Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF) are both Global Equities funds. PJBF is actively managed, while PID is passively managed. PJBF charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.56%/yr for PID.

Performance

PJBF vs. PID - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Jennison Better Future ETF (PJBF) and Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF (PID). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

PJBF

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PID

• 1D: 0.91%
• 1M: 1.99%
• 6M: 4.32%
• YTD: 7.07%
• 1Y: 15.12%
• 3Y*: 12.29%
• 5Y*: 9.61%
• 10Y*: 8.72%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PJBF vs. PID - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
PJBF PGIM Jennison Better Future ETF	0.00%
PID Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF	1.23%

PJBF vs. PID - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PJBF	PID
Technology	40.0%	9.1%
Industrials	16.5%	7.5%
Consumer Cyclical	13.8%	6.2%
Communication Services	11.5%	13.7%
Healthcare	11.5%	8.6%
Financial Services	2.5%	17.5%
Consumer Defensive	2.3%	6.2%
Utilities	2.0%	15.1%
Basic Materials	-	3.3%
Energy	-	12.5%
Real Estate	-	0.4%

Return for Risk

PJBF vs. PID — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PJBF

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

PID

PID Risk / Return Rank: 54
PID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
PID Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
PID Omega Ratio Rank: 56
PID Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
PID Martin Ratio Rank: 47

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PJBF vs. PID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Jennison Better Future ETF (PJBF) and Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF (PID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PJBF	PID	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.56	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.30	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.28	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.03	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	6.33	—

Drawdowns

PJBF vs. PID - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PJBF drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum PID drawdown of -66.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PJBF and PID.

Drawdown Indicators

	PJBF	PID	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	0.00%	-66.34%	+66.34%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-7.47%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-13.34%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-22.97%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-46.07%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.69%	+0.69%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	0.00%	-12.98%	+12.98%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.39%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	PJBF	PID	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	2.78%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	7.95%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.00%	9.77%	-9.77%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	0.00%	13.94%	-13.94%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	0.00%	17.57%	-17.57%

PJBF vs. PID - Expense Ratio Comparison

PJBF has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than PID's 0.56% expense ratio.

Dividends

PJBF vs. PID - Dividend Comparison

PJBF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.48%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PID Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF	3.48%	3.28%	3.88%	3.31%	3.30%	3.30%	3.16%	3.99%	3.87%	3.46%	3.90%	4.48%
PJBF PGIM Jennison Better Future ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, PJBF or PID?

On fees, PID is cheaper at 0.56% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, PJBF or PID?

PID is cheaper with a 0.56% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for PJBF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PJBF or PID?

PID has the higher dividend yield at 3.48%, compared with 0.00% for PJBF.

What is the main difference between PJBF and PID?

They also come from different issuers: PGIM and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for PJBF and 0.56% for PID.