PJBF vs. NZAC

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about PGIM Jennison Better Future ETF (PJBF) and SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF (NZAC).

PJBF and NZAC are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. PJBF is an actively managed fund by PGIM. It was launched on Dec 14, 2023. NZAC is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned Index. It was launched on Nov 25, 2014.

Performance

PJBF vs. NZAC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Jennison Better Future ETF (PJBF) and SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF (NZAC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

PJBF vs. NZAC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
PJBF PGIM Jennison Better Future ETF	-11.38%	5.13%	19.91%	-0.80%
NZAC SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF	-5.23%	20.55%	16.67%	0.96%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PJBF achieves a -11.38% return, which is significantly lower than NZAC's -5.23% return.

PJBF

• 1D: 4.21%
• 1M: -5.84%
• YTD: -11.38%
• 6M: -10.75%
• 1Y: 5.09%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NZAC

• 1D: 3.15%
• 1M: -5.91%
• YTD: -5.23%
• 6M: -2.63%
• 1Y: 17.22%
• 3Y*: 15.04%
• 5Y*: 8.05%
• 10Y*: 10.82%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PJBF vs. NZAC - Expense Ratio Comparison

PJBF has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than NZAC's 0.12% expense ratio.

PJBF

PGIM Jennison Better Future ETF

NZAC

SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF

Return for Risk

PJBF vs. NZAC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PJBF

PJBF Risk / Return Rank: 18
PJBF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
PJBF Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
PJBF Omega Ratio Rank: 18
PJBF Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
PJBF Martin Ratio Rank: 17

NZAC

NZAC Risk / Return Rank: 61
NZAC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
NZAC Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
NZAC Omega Ratio Rank: 59
NZAC Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
NZAC Martin Ratio Rank: 67

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PJBF vs. NZAC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Jennison Better Future ETF (PJBF) and SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF (NZAC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PJBF	NZAC	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.23	0.97	-0.74
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.49	1.51	-1.03
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.06	1.22	-0.15
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.24	1.59	-1.35
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.80	6.70	-5.90
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PJBF vs. NZAC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PJBF Sharpe Ratio is 0.23, which is lower than the NZAC Sharpe Ratio of 0.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PJBF and NZAC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PJBF	NZAC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.23	0.97	-0.74
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.48	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.64	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.22	0.54	-0.33

Correlation

The correlation between PJBF and NZAC is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

PJBF vs. NZAC - Dividend Comparison

PJBF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.27%, less than NZAC's 2.01% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PJBF PGIM Jennison Better Future ETF	0.27%	0.24%	0.16%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
NZAC SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF	2.01%	1.90%	1.88%	1.65%	1.81%	1.62%	1.59%	2.17%	2.53%	2.20%	2.00%	2.40%

Drawdowns

PJBF vs. NZAC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PJBF drawdown since its inception was -25.67%, smaller than the maximum NZAC drawdown of -33.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PJBF and NZAC.

Drawdown Indicators

	PJBF	NZAC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.67%	-33.72%	+8.05%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.41%	-10.85%	-7.56%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-28.31%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-33.72%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-14.98%	-7.27%	-7.71%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.43%	-5.39%	-0.04%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.50%	2.57%	+2.93%

Volatility

PJBF vs. NZAC - Volatility Comparison

PGIM Jennison Better Future ETF (PJBF) has a higher volatility of 8.67% compared to SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF (NZAC) at 6.18%. This indicates that PJBF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NZAC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PJBF	NZAC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.67%	6.18%	+2.49%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.98%	10.07%	+4.91%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.29%	17.91%	+4.38%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.31%	16.73%	+4.58%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.31%	17.09%	+4.22%