PJBF vs. ISRA
PJBF (PGIM Jennison Better Future ETF) and ISRA (VanEck Israel ETF) are both Global Equities funds. PJBF is actively managed, while ISRA is passively managed. Both charge a 0.59% expense ratio.
Performance
PJBF vs. ISRA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
PJBF
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ISRA
- 1D
- -1.43%
- 1M
- 0.99%
- 6M
- 3.09%
- YTD
- 10.69%
- 1Y
- 28.48%
- 3Y*
- 22.58%
- 5Y*
- 8.95%
- 10Y*
- 10.34%
PJBF vs. ISRA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
PJBF PGIM Jennison Better Future ETF | 0.00% |
ISRA VanEck Israel ETF | 1.94% |
PJBF vs. ISRA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PJBF
ISRA
Technology
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
PJBF
ISRA
Industrials
PJBF
ISRA
Consumer Cyclical
PJBF
ISRA
Communication Services
PJBF
ISRA
Healthcare
PJBF
ISRA
Financial Services
PJBF
ISRA
Consumer Defensive
PJBF
ISRA
Utilities
PJBF
ISRA
Basic Materials
PJBF
-
ISRA
Energy
PJBF
-
ISRA
Real Estate
PJBF
-
ISRA
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PJBF vs. ISRA — Risk / Return Rank
PJBF
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ISRA
PJBF vs. ISRA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Jennison Better Future ETF (PJBF) and VanEck Israel ETF (ISRA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PJBF | ISRA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.24 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.45 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 7.28 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PJBF vs. ISRA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PJBF drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum ISRA drawdown of -45.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PJBF and ISRA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PJBF | ISRA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -45.02% | +45.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -11.65% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -27.74% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -45.02% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -45.02% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -7.54% | +7.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -11.16% | +11.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.92% | — |
Volatility
PJBF vs. ISRA - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PJBF | ISRA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 7.01% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 16.60% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.00% | 21.24% | -21.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.00% | 22.19% | -22.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.00% | 21.02% | -21.02% |
PJBF vs. ISRA - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both PJBF and ISRA have an expense ratio of 0.59%.
Dividends
PJBF vs. ISRA - Dividend Comparison
PJBF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ISRA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.34%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ISRA VanEck Israel ETF | 1.34% | 1.48% | 1.21% | 1.89% | 1.36% | 1.28% | 0.17% | 1.38% | 0.76% | 1.58% | 1.62% | 1.31% |
PJBF PGIM Jennison Better Future ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Both ETFs have the same 0.59% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PJBF and ISRA have the same expense ratio: 0.59% per year.
ISRA has the higher dividend yield at 1.34%, compared with 0.00% for PJBF.
They also come from different issuers: PGIM and VanEck.
Find the right allocation for PJBF and ISRA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer