PJAN vs. XYLG
PJAN (Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - January) and XYLG (Global X S&P 500 Covered Call & Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PJAN is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the Cboe S&P 500 15% Buffer Protect January Series Index, while XYLG is a Derivative Income fund tracking the Cboe S&P 500 Half BuyWrite Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PJAN returned 8.92%/yr vs 10.64%/yr for XYLG. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PJAN charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XYLG.
Performance
PJAN vs. XYLG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PJAN achieves a 5.13% return, which is significantly lower than XYLG's 7.92% return.
PJAN
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- 1.94%
- YTD
- 5.13%
- 6M
- 5.96%
- 1Y
- 14.71%
- 3Y*
- 12.96%
- 5Y*
- 8.92%
- 10Y*
- —
XYLG
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- 3.65%
- YTD
- 7.92%
- 6M
- 8.68%
- 1Y
- 23.12%
- 3Y*
- 16.66%
- 5Y*
- 10.64%
- 10Y*
- —
PJAN vs. XYLG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PJAN Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - January | 5.13% | 11.29% | 13.45% | 18.18% | -5.29% | 8.80% | 5.64% |
XYLG Global X S&P 500 Covered Call & Growth ETF | 7.92% | 12.93% | 22.31% | 18.16% | -15.46% | 23.81% | 12.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between PJAN and XYLG is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2020 | 0.87 |
The correlation between PJAN and XYLG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PJAN vs. XYLG — Risk / Return Rank
PJAN
XYLG
PJAN vs. XYLG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - January (PJAN) and Global X S&P 500 Covered Call & Growth ETF (XYLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PJAN | XYLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.54 | 1.46 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.19 | 3.35 | -0.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.03 | 16.95 | +0.09 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PJAN | XYLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.55 | 2.45 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.00 | 0.76 | +0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.90 | 0.98 | -0.09 |
Drawdowns
PJAN vs. XYLG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PJAN drawdown since its inception was -21.25%, roughly equal to the maximum XYLG drawdown of -21.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PJAN and XYLG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PJAN | XYLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.25% | -21.30% | +0.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.63% | -6.93% | +2.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.49% | -17.42% | +6.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -11.93% | -21.30% | +9.37% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.26% | -0.36% | +0.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.73% | -4.10% | +2.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.87% | 1.37% | -0.50% |
Volatility
PJAN vs. XYLG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - January (PJAN) is 1.07%, while Global X S&P 500 Covered Call & Growth ETF (XYLG) has a volatility of 2.53%. This indicates that PJAN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XYLG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PJAN | XYLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.07% | 2.53% | -1.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.71% | 7.58% | -2.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.81% | 9.50% | -3.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.93% | 14.00% | -5.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.60% | 13.86% | -3.26% |
PJAN vs. XYLG - Expense Ratio Comparison
PJAN has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than XYLG's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
PJAN vs. XYLG - Dividend Comparison
PJAN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XYLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.06%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PJAN Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - January | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XYLG Global X S&P 500 Covered Call & Growth ETF | 13.06% | 13.94% | 23.65% | 4.90% | 6.43% | 7.40% | 1.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PJAN and XYLG have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XYLG has higher volatility (2.53%) compared to PJAN (1.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PJAN dropped -21.25% vs XYLG's -21.30%.
On 5-year performance, XYLG leads with 10.64% vs 8.92% for PJAN. On fees, XYLG is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, PJAN has been the lower-risk option at 1.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, XYLG has performed better with a 10.64% return vs 8.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XYLG is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for PJAN.
XYLG has the higher dividend yield at 13.06%, compared with 0.00% for PJAN.
PJAN is categorized as Defined Outcome, while XYLG is Derivative Income. PJAN tracks Cboe S&P 500 15% Buffer Protect January Series Index, while XYLG tracks Cboe S&P 500 Half BuyWrite Index. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for PJAN and 0.35% for XYLG.
PJAN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.55 vs 2.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PJAN and XYLG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer