PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PIZ vs. XMVM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PIZ vs. XMVM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco DWA Developed Markets Momentum ETF (PIZ) and Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF (XMVM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PIZ achieves a 7.58% return, which is significantly lower than XMVM's 18.13% return. Over the past 10 years, PIZ has underperformed XMVM with an annualized return of 10.07%, while XMVM has yielded a comparatively higher 12.28% annualized return.


PIZ

1D
1.13%
1M
-4.68%
6M
0.00%
YTD
7.58%
1Y
17.42%
3Y*
21.00%
5Y*
7.22%
10Y*
10.07%
ALL TIME*
5.66%

XMVM

1D
0.59%
1M
5.73%
6M
13.53%
YTD
18.13%
1Y
39.09%
3Y*
18.08%
5Y*
12.87%
10Y*
12.28%
ALL TIME*
9.73%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$5.38M$4.25M$4.38M
$2.19M$2.07M$1.98M

PIZ vs. XMVM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PIZ
Invesco DWA Developed Markets Momentum ETF
7.58%37.22%16.30%17.96%-30.48%20.53%17.96%27.51%-16.15%30.96%
XMVM
Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF
18.13%18.46%11.73%16.31%-8.21%35.15%5.68%30.38%-9.62%2.79%

Correlation

The correlation between PIZ and XMVM is 0.33, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.58

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 7, 2008

0.63

Over the past year, the correlation between PIZ and XMVM has dropped to 0.33 - well below their long-term average of 0.63, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

PIZ vs. XMVM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PIZ
XMVM

Industrials

46.9%
11.7%

Financial Services

27.8%
37.9%

Technology

15.7%
5.1%

Basic Materials

2.5%
0.8%

Consumer Defensive

1.9%
1.2%

Consumer Cyclical

1.7%
14.8%

Energy

1.5%
13.5%

Utilities

1.4%
8.5%

Healthcare

0.7%
2.5%

Real Estate

0.4%
4.9%

Communication Services

-

0.9%

Industrials

PIZ
46.9%
XMVM
11.7%

Financial Services

PIZ
27.8%
XMVM
37.9%

Technology

PIZ
15.7%
XMVM
5.1%

Basic Materials

PIZ
2.5%
XMVM
0.8%

Consumer Defensive

PIZ
1.9%
XMVM
1.2%

Consumer Cyclical

PIZ
1.7%
XMVM
14.8%

Energy

PIZ
1.5%
XMVM
13.5%

Utilities

PIZ
1.4%
XMVM
8.5%

Healthcare

PIZ
0.7%
XMVM
2.5%

Real Estate

PIZ
0.4%
XMVM
4.9%

Communication Services

PIZ

-

XMVM
0.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PIZ vs. XMVM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PIZ
PIZ Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
PIZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PIZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
PIZ Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
PIZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
PIZ Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

XMVM
XMVM Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
XMVM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XMVM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
XMVM Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
XMVM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
XMVM Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PIZ vs. XMVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DWA Developed Markets Momentum ETF (PIZ) and Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF (XMVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PIZXMVMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.93

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.48

-0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.10

4.28

-3.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.41

13.71

-10.31

PIZ vs. XMVM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PIZ Sharpe Ratio is 0.74, which is lower than the XMVM Sharpe Ratio of 2.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PIZ and XMVM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PIZ vs. XMVM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PIZ drawdown since its inception was -60.61%, roughly equal to the maximum XMVM drawdown of -62.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PIZ and XMVM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PIZXMVMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.61%

-62.83%

+2.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.97%

-9.18%

-6.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.97%

-24.12%

+8.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.93%

-24.12%

-16.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.93%

-45.07%

+4.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.41%

-0.12%

-11.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.86%

-10.19%

-4.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.13%

2.86%

+2.27%

Volatility

PIZ vs. XMVM - Volatility Comparison

Invesco DWA Developed Markets Momentum ETF (PIZ) has a higher volatility of 8.01% compared to Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF (XMVM) at 3.30%. This indicates that PIZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XMVM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PIZXMVMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.01%

3.30%

+4.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.44%

9.25%

+12.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.70%

14.72%

+8.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.63%

21.24%

-0.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.71%

22.74%

-3.03%

PIZ vs. XMVM - Expense Ratio Comparison

PIZ has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than XMVM's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

PIZ vs. XMVM - Dividend Comparison

PIZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.60%, less than XMVM's 1.78% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PIZ
Invesco DWA Developed Markets Momentum ETF
1.60%1.55%1.68%1.86%2.04%1.01%0.37%1.58%1.06%1.30%2.21%1.09%
XMVM
Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF
1.78%2.07%1.43%1.57%1.76%1.10%1.37%1.73%2.87%2.22%2.27%2.58%

Frequently Asked Questions


PIZ and XMVM have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PIZ has higher volatility (8.01%) compared to XMVM (3.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PIZ dropped -60.61% vs XMVM's -62.83%.

On 10-year performance, XMVM leads with 12.28% vs 10.07% for PIZ. On fees, XMVM is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, XMVM has been the lower-risk option at 3.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XMVM has performed better with a 12.28% return vs 10.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XMVM is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for PIZ.

XMVM has the higher dividend yield at 1.78%, compared with 1.60% for PIZ.

PIZ tracks Dorsey Wright Developed Markets Technical Leaders Index, while XMVM tracks S&P MidCap 400 High Momentum Value Index. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for PIZ and 0.39% for XMVM.

XMVM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.67 vs 0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PIZ and XMVM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer