PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PIZ vs. UGA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PIZ vs. UGA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco DWA Developed Markets Momentum ETF (PIZ) and United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PIZ achieves a 14.98% return, which is significantly lower than UGA's 64.09% return. Over the past 10 years, PIZ has underperformed UGA with an annualized return of 11.51%, while UGA has yielded a comparatively higher 14.31% annualized return.


PIZ

1D
-4.77%
1M
-0.77%
YTD
14.98%
6M
14.14%
1Y
26.96%
3Y*
25.46%
5Y*
10.11%
10Y*
11.51%

UGA

1D
-1.12%
1M
-12.11%
YTD
64.09%
6M
60.42%
1Y
59.74%
3Y*
18.95%
5Y*
22.69%
10Y*
14.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PIZ vs. UGA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PIZ
Invesco DWA Developed Markets Momentum ETF
14.98%37.22%16.30%17.96%-30.48%20.53%17.96%27.51%-16.15%30.96%
UGA
United States Gasoline Fund LP
64.09%-2.00%3.77%1.27%46.34%68.49%-24.88%41.25%-28.07%1.69%

Correlation

The correlation between PIZ and UGA is -0.26, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.09

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2008

0.26

The correlation between PIZ and UGA shifts across timeframes, from -0.26 (1 year) to 0.26 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PIZ vs. UGA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PIZ
PIZ Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
PIZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PIZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
PIZ Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
PIZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
PIZ Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

UGA
UGA Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
UGA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UGA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
UGA Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
UGA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
UGA Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PIZ vs. UGA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DWA Developed Markets Momentum ETF (PIZ) and United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PIZUGADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.30

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.89

3.17

-1.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.92

9.39

-2.47

PIZ vs. UGA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PIZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.21, which is lower than the UGA Sharpe Ratio of 1.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PIZ and UGA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PIZ vs. UGA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PIZ drawdown since its inception was -60.61%, smaller than the maximum UGA drawdown of -86.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PIZ and UGA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PIZUGADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.61%

-86.59%

+25.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.35%

-18.96%

+4.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.67%

-26.68%

+12.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.93%

-38.11%

-2.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.93%

-75.89%

+34.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.31%

-18.05%

+12.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.89%

-36.69%

+21.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.90%

6.43%

-2.53%

Volatility

PIZ vs. UGA - Volatility Comparison

Invesco DWA Developed Markets Momentum ETF (PIZ) has a higher volatility of 10.97% compared to United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA) at 9.24%. This indicates that PIZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UGA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PIZUGADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.97%

9.24%

+1.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.32%

30.57%

-10.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.48%

35.22%

-12.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.37%

34.45%

-14.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.63%

37.22%

-17.59%

PIZ vs. UGA - Expense Ratio Comparison

PIZ has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than UGA's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

PIZ vs. UGA - Dividend Comparison

PIZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.49%, while UGA has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PIZ
Invesco DWA Developed Markets Momentum ETF
1.49%1.55%1.68%1.86%2.04%1.01%0.37%1.58%1.06%1.30%2.21%1.09%
UGA
United States Gasoline Fund LP
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PIZ and UGA have a correlation of -0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PIZ has higher volatility (10.97%) compared to UGA (9.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PIZ dropped -60.61% vs UGA's -86.59%.

On 10-year performance, UGA leads with 14.31% vs 11.51% for PIZ. On fees, UGA is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, UGA has been the lower-risk option at 9.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, UGA has performed better with a 14.31% return vs 11.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

UGA is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for PIZ.

PIZ has the higher dividend yield at 1.49%, compared with 0.00% for UGA.

PIZ is categorized as Momentum, while UGA is Oil & Gas. PIZ tracks Dorsey Wright Developed Markets Technical Leaders Index, while UGA tracks Front Month Unleaded Gasoline. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for PIZ and 0.75% for UGA.

UGA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs 1.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PIZ and UGA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer