PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PIZ vs. PEZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PIZ vs. PEZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco DWA Developed Markets Momentum ETF (PIZ) and Invesco DWA Consumer Cyclicals Momentum ETF (PEZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PIZ achieves a 16.21% return, which is significantly higher than PEZ's -4.23% return. Over the past 10 years, PIZ has outperformed PEZ with an annualized return of 10.75%, while PEZ has yielded a comparatively lower 9.46% annualized return.


PIZ

1D
-0.99%
1M
1.00%
YTD
16.21%
6M
18.89%
1Y
29.33%
3Y*
25.82%
5Y*
10.38%
10Y*
10.75%

PEZ

1D
0.45%
1M
0.97%
YTD
-4.23%
6M
-0.27%
1Y
5.43%
3Y*
14.83%
5Y*
2.63%
10Y*
9.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PIZ vs. PEZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PIZ
Invesco DWA Developed Markets Momentum ETF
16.21%37.22%16.30%17.96%-30.48%20.53%17.96%27.51%-16.15%30.96%
PEZ
Invesco DWA Consumer Cyclicals Momentum ETF
-4.23%5.40%20.06%29.55%-29.59%20.35%38.97%18.05%-6.85%19.87%

Correlation

The correlation between PIZ and PEZ is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 8, 2008

0.63

The correlation between PIZ and PEZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

PIZ vs. PEZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PIZ
PEZ

Industrials

49.9%
3.8%

Financial Services

28.1%
0.6%

Technology

10.9%
4.0%

Basic Materials

2.6%

-

Consumer Defensive

2.1%
8.7%

Energy

2.0%

-

Utilities

1.6%

-

Consumer Cyclical

1.6%
66.0%

Healthcare

1.1%
6.9%

Real Estate

0.5%
1.9%

Communication Services

-

11.9%

Industrials

PIZ
49.9%
PEZ
3.8%

Financial Services

PIZ
28.1%
PEZ
0.6%

Technology

PIZ
10.9%
PEZ
4.0%

Basic Materials

PIZ
2.6%
PEZ

-

Consumer Defensive

PIZ
2.1%
PEZ
8.7%

Energy

PIZ
2.0%
PEZ

-

Utilities

PIZ
1.6%
PEZ

-

Consumer Cyclical

PIZ
1.6%
PEZ
66.0%

Healthcare

PIZ
1.1%
PEZ
6.9%

Real Estate

PIZ
0.5%
PEZ
1.9%

Communication Services

PIZ

-

PEZ
11.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PIZ vs. PEZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PIZ
PIZ Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
PIZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PIZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
PIZ Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
PIZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
PIZ Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

PEZ
PEZ Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
PEZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PEZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
PEZ Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
PEZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
PEZ Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PIZ vs. PEZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DWA Developed Markets Momentum ETF (PIZ) and Invesco DWA Consumer Cyclicals Momentum ETF (PEZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PIZPEZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.06

+0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.05

0.34

+1.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.17

0.91

+7.26

PIZ vs. PEZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PIZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is higher than the PEZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PIZ and PEZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PIZPEZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.44

0.27

+1.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

0.11

+0.42

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

0.38

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.28

0.32

-0.04

Drawdowns

PIZ vs. PEZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PIZ drawdown since its inception was -60.61%, roughly equal to the maximum PEZ drawdown of -58.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PIZ and PEZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PIZPEZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.61%

-58.39%

-2.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.35%

-15.83%

+1.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.67%

-31.48%

+16.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.93%

-41.72%

+0.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.93%

-52.05%

+11.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.30%

-11.25%

+6.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.87%

-13.86%

-1.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.60%

5.96%

-2.36%

Volatility

PIZ vs. PEZ - Volatility Comparison

Invesco DWA Developed Markets Momentum ETF (PIZ) has a higher volatility of 8.23% compared to Invesco DWA Consumer Cyclicals Momentum ETF (PEZ) at 4.91%. This indicates that PIZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PEZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PIZPEZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.23%

4.91%

+3.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.93%

15.13%

+2.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.45%

20.07%

+0.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.94%

24.48%

-4.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.65%

25.06%

-5.41%

PIZ vs. PEZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

PIZ has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than PEZ's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

PIZ vs. PEZ - Dividend Comparison

PIZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.34%, more than PEZ's 0.22% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PEZ
Invesco DWA Consumer Cyclicals Momentum ETF
0.22%0.11%0.12%0.60%0.43%0.23%0.39%0.01%0.40%0.42%0.83%0.64%
PIZ
Invesco DWA Developed Markets Momentum ETF
1.34%1.55%1.68%1.86%2.04%1.01%0.37%1.58%1.06%1.30%2.21%1.09%

Frequently Asked Questions


PIZ and PEZ have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PIZ has higher volatility (8.23%) compared to PEZ (4.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PIZ dropped -60.61% vs PEZ's -58.39%.

On 10-year performance, PIZ leads with 10.75% vs 9.46% for PEZ. On fees, PEZ is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, PEZ has been the lower-risk option at 4.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, PIZ has performed better with a 10.75% return vs 9.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PEZ is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for PIZ.

PIZ has the higher dividend yield at 1.34%, compared with 0.22% for PEZ.

PIZ tracks Dorsey Wright Developed Markets Technical Leaders Index, while PEZ tracks DWA Consumer Cyclicals Technical Leaders Index. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for PIZ and 0.60% for PEZ.

PIZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs 0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PIZ and PEZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer