PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PIZ vs. MTUM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PIZ vs. MTUM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco DWA Developed Markets Momentum ETF (PIZ) and iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PIZ achieves a 16.21% return, which is significantly lower than MTUM's 31.75% return. Over the past 10 years, PIZ has underperformed MTUM with an annualized return of 10.75%, while MTUM has yielded a comparatively higher 17.31% annualized return.


PIZ

1D
-0.99%
1M
1.00%
YTD
16.21%
6M
18.89%
1Y
29.33%
3Y*
25.82%
5Y*
10.38%
10Y*
10.75%

MTUM

1D
1.06%
1M
15.90%
YTD
31.75%
6M
32.38%
1Y
41.76%
3Y*
34.75%
5Y*
15.21%
10Y*
17.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PIZ vs. MTUM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PIZ
Invesco DWA Developed Markets Momentum ETF
16.21%37.22%16.30%17.96%-30.48%20.53%17.96%27.51%-16.15%30.96%
MTUM
iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF
31.75%22.15%32.89%9.15%-18.27%13.36%29.86%27.25%-1.67%37.50%

Correlation

The correlation between PIZ and MTUM is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 19, 2013

0.69

The correlation between PIZ and MTUM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

PIZ vs. MTUM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PIZ
MTUM

Industrials

49.9%
15.6%

Financial Services

28.1%
10.4%

Technology

10.9%
44.4%

Basic Materials

2.6%
1.7%

Consumer Defensive

2.1%
3.3%

Energy

2.0%
3.5%

Utilities

1.6%
1.6%

Consumer Cyclical

1.6%
3.6%

Healthcare

1.1%
6.9%

Real Estate

0.5%
1.8%

Communication Services

-

7.4%

Industrials

PIZ
49.9%
MTUM
15.6%

Financial Services

PIZ
28.1%
MTUM
10.4%

Technology

PIZ
10.9%
MTUM
44.4%

Basic Materials

PIZ
2.6%
MTUM
1.7%

Consumer Defensive

PIZ
2.1%
MTUM
3.3%

Energy

PIZ
2.0%
MTUM
3.5%

Utilities

PIZ
1.6%
MTUM
1.6%

Consumer Cyclical

PIZ
1.6%
MTUM
3.6%

Healthcare

PIZ
1.1%
MTUM
6.9%

Real Estate

PIZ
0.5%
MTUM
1.8%

Communication Services

PIZ

-

MTUM
7.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PIZ vs. MTUM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PIZ
PIZ Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
PIZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PIZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
PIZ Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
PIZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
PIZ Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

MTUM
MTUM Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
MTUM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MTUM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
MTUM Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
MTUM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
MTUM Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PIZ vs. MTUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DWA Developed Markets Momentum ETF (PIZ) and iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PIZMTUMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.76

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.86

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.39

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.05

3.64

-1.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.17

14.50

-6.33

PIZ vs. MTUM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PIZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is lower than the MTUM Sharpe Ratio of 2.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PIZ and MTUM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PIZMTUMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.44

2.20

-0.76

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

0.74

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

0.83

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.28

0.85

-0.57

Drawdowns

PIZ vs. MTUM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PIZ drawdown since its inception was -60.61%, which is greater than MTUM's maximum drawdown of -34.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PIZ and MTUM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PIZMTUMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.61%

-34.08%

-26.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.35%

-11.54%

-2.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.67%

-20.99%

+6.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.93%

-32.28%

-8.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.93%

-34.08%

-6.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.30%

0.00%

-4.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.87%

-6.21%

-8.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.60%

2.89%

+0.71%

Volatility

PIZ vs. MTUM - Volatility Comparison

Invesco DWA Developed Markets Momentum ETF (PIZ) has a higher volatility of 8.23% compared to iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM) at 7.68%. This indicates that PIZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MTUM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PIZMTUMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.23%

7.68%

+0.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.93%

16.46%

+1.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.45%

19.04%

+1.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.94%

20.60%

-0.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.65%

21.03%

-1.38%

PIZ vs. MTUM - Expense Ratio Comparison

PIZ has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than MTUM's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

PIZ vs. MTUM - Dividend Comparison

PIZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.34%, more than MTUM's 0.60% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MTUM
iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF
0.60%0.91%0.75%1.35%1.80%0.55%0.83%1.48%1.27%1.02%1.43%1.12%
PIZ
Invesco DWA Developed Markets Momentum ETF
1.34%1.55%1.68%1.86%2.04%1.01%0.37%1.58%1.06%1.30%2.21%1.09%

Frequently Asked Questions


PIZ and MTUM have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PIZ has higher volatility (8.23%) compared to MTUM (7.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PIZ dropped -60.61% vs MTUM's -34.08%.

On 10-year performance, MTUM leads with 17.31% vs 10.75% for PIZ. On fees, MTUM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, MTUM has been the lower-risk option at 7.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, MTUM has performed better with a 17.31% return vs 10.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MTUM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for PIZ.

PIZ has the higher dividend yield at 1.34%, compared with 0.60% for MTUM.

PIZ tracks Dorsey Wright Developed Markets Technical Leaders Index, while MTUM tracks MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for PIZ and 0.15% for MTUM.

MTUM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PIZ and MTUM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer