PIZ vs. MTUM
PIZ (Invesco DWA Developed Markets Momentum ETF) and MTUM (iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF) are both Momentum funds - PIZ tracks the Dorsey Wright Developed Markets Technical Leaders Index while MTUM tracks the MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PIZ returned 10.75%/yr vs 17.31%/yr for MTUM. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PIZ charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for MTUM.
Performance
PIZ vs. MTUM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PIZ achieves a 16.21% return, which is significantly lower than MTUM's 31.75% return. Over the past 10 years, PIZ has underperformed MTUM with an annualized return of 10.75%, while MTUM has yielded a comparatively higher 17.31% annualized return.
PIZ
- 1D
- -0.99%
- 1M
- 1.00%
- YTD
- 16.21%
- 6M
- 18.89%
- 1Y
- 29.33%
- 3Y*
- 25.82%
- 5Y*
- 10.38%
- 10Y*
- 10.75%
MTUM
- 1D
- 1.06%
- 1M
- 15.90%
- YTD
- 31.75%
- 6M
- 32.38%
- 1Y
- 41.76%
- 3Y*
- 34.75%
- 5Y*
- 15.21%
- 10Y*
- 17.31%
PIZ vs. MTUM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PIZ Invesco DWA Developed Markets Momentum ETF | 16.21% | 37.22% | 16.30% | 17.96% | -30.48% | 20.53% | 17.96% | 27.51% | -16.15% | 30.96% |
MTUM iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF | 31.75% | 22.15% | 32.89% | 9.15% | -18.27% | 13.36% | 29.86% | 27.25% | -1.67% | 37.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between PIZ and MTUM is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 19, 2013 | 0.69 |
The correlation between PIZ and MTUM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.
PIZ vs. MTUM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PIZ
MTUM
Industrials
Financial Services
Technology
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Real Estate
Communication Services
-
Industrials
PIZ
MTUM
Financial Services
PIZ
MTUM
Technology
PIZ
MTUM
Basic Materials
PIZ
MTUM
Consumer Defensive
PIZ
MTUM
Energy
PIZ
MTUM
Utilities
PIZ
MTUM
Consumer Cyclical
PIZ
MTUM
Healthcare
PIZ
MTUM
Real Estate
PIZ
MTUM
Communication Services
PIZ
-
MTUM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PIZ vs. MTUM — Risk / Return Rank
PIZ
MTUM
PIZ vs. MTUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DWA Developed Markets Momentum ETF (PIZ) and iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PIZ | MTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.76 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.86 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.39 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.05 | 3.64 | -1.58 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.17 | 14.50 | -6.33 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PIZ | MTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.44 | 2.20 | -0.76 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 | 0.74 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 | 0.83 | -0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.28 | 0.85 | -0.57 |
Drawdowns
PIZ vs. MTUM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PIZ drawdown since its inception was -60.61%, which is greater than MTUM's maximum drawdown of -34.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PIZ and MTUM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PIZ | MTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.61% | -34.08% | -26.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.35% | -11.54% | -2.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.67% | -20.99% | +6.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.93% | -32.28% | -8.65% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.93% | -34.08% | -6.85% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.30% | 0.00% | -4.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.87% | -6.21% | -8.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.60% | 2.89% | +0.71% |
Volatility
PIZ vs. MTUM - Volatility Comparison
Invesco DWA Developed Markets Momentum ETF (PIZ) has a higher volatility of 8.23% compared to iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM) at 7.68%. This indicates that PIZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MTUM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PIZ | MTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.23% | 7.68% | +0.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.93% | 16.46% | +1.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.45% | 19.04% | +1.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.94% | 20.60% | -0.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.65% | 21.03% | -1.38% |
PIZ vs. MTUM - Expense Ratio Comparison
PIZ has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than MTUM's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
PIZ vs. MTUM - Dividend Comparison
PIZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.34%, more than MTUM's 0.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MTUM iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF | 0.60% | 0.91% | 0.75% | 1.35% | 1.80% | 0.55% | 0.83% | 1.48% | 1.27% | 1.02% | 1.43% | 1.12% |
PIZ Invesco DWA Developed Markets Momentum ETF | 1.34% | 1.55% | 1.68% | 1.86% | 2.04% | 1.01% | 0.37% | 1.58% | 1.06% | 1.30% | 2.21% | 1.09% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PIZ and MTUM have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PIZ has higher volatility (8.23%) compared to MTUM (7.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PIZ dropped -60.61% vs MTUM's -34.08%.
On 10-year performance, MTUM leads with 17.31% vs 10.75% for PIZ. On fees, MTUM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, MTUM has been the lower-risk option at 7.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, MTUM has performed better with a 17.31% return vs 10.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MTUM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for PIZ.
PIZ has the higher dividend yield at 1.34%, compared with 0.60% for MTUM.
PIZ tracks Dorsey Wright Developed Markets Technical Leaders Index, while MTUM tracks MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for PIZ and 0.15% for MTUM.
MTUM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PIZ and MTUM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer