PIZ vs. DFIV
PIZ (Invesco DWA Developed Markets Momentum ETF) and DFIV (Dimensional International Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PIZ is a Momentum fund tracking the Dorsey Wright Developed Markets Technical Leaders Index, while DFIV is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by Dimensional. PIZ is passively managed, while DFIV is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, PIZ returned 25.82%/yr vs 23.90%/yr for DFIV. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PIZ charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.27%/yr for DFIV.
Performance
PIZ vs. DFIV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PIZ achieves a 16.21% return, which is significantly higher than DFIV's 11.54% return.
PIZ
- 1D
- -0.99%
- 1M
- 1.00%
- YTD
- 16.21%
- 6M
- 18.89%
- 1Y
- 29.33%
- 3Y*
- 25.82%
- 5Y*
- 10.38%
- 10Y*
- 10.75%
DFIV
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 2.57%
- YTD
- 11.54%
- 6M
- 15.41%
- 1Y
- 34.88%
- 3Y*
- 23.90%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PIZ vs. DFIV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PIZ Invesco DWA Developed Markets Momentum ETF | 16.21% | 37.22% | 16.30% | 17.96% | -30.48% | -2.05% |
DFIV Dimensional International Value ETF | 11.54% | 45.36% | 7.26% | 17.75% | -3.70% | 0.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between PIZ and DFIV is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 14, 2021 | 0.79 |
The correlation between PIZ and DFIV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.
PIZ vs. DFIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PIZ
DFIV
Industrials
Financial Services
Technology
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Real Estate
Communication Services
-
Industrials
PIZ
DFIV
Financial Services
PIZ
DFIV
Technology
PIZ
DFIV
Basic Materials
PIZ
DFIV
Consumer Defensive
PIZ
DFIV
Energy
PIZ
DFIV
Utilities
PIZ
DFIV
Consumer Cyclical
PIZ
DFIV
Healthcare
PIZ
DFIV
Real Estate
PIZ
DFIV
Communication Services
PIZ
-
DFIV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PIZ vs. DFIV — Risk / Return Rank
PIZ
DFIV
PIZ vs. DFIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DWA Developed Markets Momentum ETF (PIZ) and Dimensional International Value ETF (DFIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PIZ | DFIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.46 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.05 | 3.63 | -1.57 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.17 | 14.02 | -5.85 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PIZ | DFIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.44 | 2.56 | -1.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.28 | 0.94 | -0.66 |
Drawdowns
PIZ vs. DFIV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PIZ drawdown since its inception was -60.61%, which is greater than DFIV's maximum drawdown of -25.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PIZ and DFIV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PIZ | DFIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.61% | -25.42% | -35.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.35% | -9.66% | -4.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.67% | -14.72% | +0.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.93% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.93% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.30% | -1.02% | -3.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.87% | -4.48% | -10.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.60% | 2.49% | +1.11% |
Volatility
PIZ vs. DFIV - Volatility Comparison
Invesco DWA Developed Markets Momentum ETF (PIZ) has a higher volatility of 8.23% compared to Dimensional International Value ETF (DFIV) at 3.89%. This indicates that PIZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PIZ | DFIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.23% | 3.89% | +4.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.93% | 10.99% | +6.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.45% | 13.69% | +6.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.94% | 16.63% | +3.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.65% | 16.63% | +3.02% |
PIZ vs. DFIV - Expense Ratio Comparison
PIZ has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than DFIV's 0.27% expense ratio.
Dividends
PIZ vs. DFIV - Dividend Comparison
PIZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.34%, less than DFIV's 2.55% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFIV Dimensional International Value ETF | 2.55% | 2.92% | 3.88% | 3.93% | 3.84% | 2.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PIZ Invesco DWA Developed Markets Momentum ETF | 1.34% | 1.55% | 1.68% | 1.86% | 2.04% | 1.01% | 0.37% | 1.58% | 1.06% | 1.30% | 2.21% | 1.09% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PIZ and DFIV have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PIZ has higher volatility (8.23%) compared to DFIV (3.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PIZ dropped -60.61% vs DFIV's -25.42%.
On 3-year performance, PIZ leads with 25.82% vs 23.90% for DFIV. On fees, DFIV is cheaper at 0.27% per year. On volatility, DFIV has been the lower-risk option at 3.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, PIZ has performed better with a 25.82% return vs 23.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DFIV is cheaper with a 0.27% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for PIZ.
DFIV has the higher dividend yield at 2.55%, compared with 1.34% for PIZ.
PIZ is categorized as Momentum, while DFIV is Foreign Large Cap Equities. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Dimensional. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for PIZ and 0.27% for DFIV.
DFIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.56 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PIZ and DFIV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer